Hi,<br>I'm testing texmaker. It seems good and I think we can substitute kile for texmaker (as Ricardo had suggested). These are my reasons:<br><br>PRO - Texmaker:<br>- It's very easy to use;<br>- When you install Texmaker all other dependent packages are installed (like for Kile);<br>
- Texmaker is lighter than Kile (Kile wants 168 dependend packages and 1462 mega of space; Texmaker 58 packages and 764 mega)<br>- Kile is designed for KDE and need some KDE packages, Texmaker not.<br><br>CONTRA - Texmaker:<br>
- It misses some little functions that are in Kile, but they are not important function in my opinion.<br><br>I suggest to install texlive-fonts-extra (it isn't installed with kile nor with texmaker). It is a bit great (260 mega) but it contains extra fonts for ancient languages: greek, ugarite, hieroglyph, etruscan, etc... very usefull for archaeologists!!<br>
<br><br>For bibliography (bibtex) editors there are some possibilities: Kbibtex (KDE), pybliography, tkbibtex, jabref, etc. Usually I don't use these softwares but I tested some of them and I think the best for ArcheOS is jabref (based on java). Debian package is available.<br>
<br>If you are agree I delete Kile from ArcheOS package list and I insert just texmaker - texlive-fonts-extra - jabref.<br><br>Bye,<br>Denis<br>
<br>