Sun May 9 00:59:51 CEST 2004
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 12:33:18AM +0200, Oleg Gusev wrote:
> kapmd ? I thought it is a kernel thread in 2.6.
It exists in my 2.4 setup.
> Anyway, i have only 'apmd' process. If it will be killed, so what?
Well, the whole machine goes down when kapmd is kill -TERM by debian
in /etc/rc0.d/S20sendsigs so that the partitions never get a chance
to be umounted by /etc/rc0.d/S40umountfs, and I'm in for a long fsck
at next reboot (no journalling).
Or is there a lightweight journalling filesystem fit for the j820?
> We can always change the signal handler if it matters.
Well, if you know how to change the signal handler to not kill the whole
machine with the kapmd, I'm a taker.
Alternatively, what functionality do I lose
if I take apm away from the kernel?
[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ]
[ TUNES project for a Free Reflective Computing System | http://tunes.org ]
Reason isn't about lack of a prejudices, but about presence of postjudices.
More information about the Jornada820