[LTP] [RFC PATCH 2/2] netstress: Update help for -m behavior

Alexey Kodanev alexey.kodanev@oracle.com
Thu Aug 16 14:01:16 CEST 2018


On 08/16/2018 02:16 PM, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi Alexey,
> 
>>>> Hi Petr,
> 
>>>> Since the server waits for requests from the client, the timeout
>>>> value for UDP/DCCP is the same as for the other protocols. Also the
>>>> server starts earlier than the client, so it should wait some time
>>>> to get the client requests.
> 
>>>> I've changed the client side only because either request from the
>>>> client or reply from the server might be lost.
> 
>>> Thanks for your explanation.
>>> I mean: UDP itself is the only protocol which don't support listen() so
>>> netstress server using UDP timeouts after some time. The default is 100ms.
> 
>> Hmm, for the server the default should be 60 sec. Does it timeout earlier?
> Yes. The timeout is affected by value of -m. Thats' what I meant by my previous:
> $ date +"%T.%3N"; testcases/network/netstress/netstress -m 1 -T udp; date +"%T.%3N"
> 15:52:34.501
> tst_test.c:1015: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
> The timeout is actually 1ms. Try it with -m 1000 and it'll be indeed 1s
> netstress.c:917: INFO: max requests '3'
> netstress.c:944: INFO: using UDP
> netstress.c:676: INFO: assigning a name to the server socket...
> netstress.c:683: INFO: bind to port 47728
> netstress.c:575: FAIL: recv failed, sock '3'
> netstress.c:642: BROK: Server closed
> ...
> 15:52:34.516
> 
> 
> This is caused by udp/udp_lite not using listen(), but maybe is should be at
> least mentioned in help (if wanted behavior).

Agree.


Thanks,
Alexey


More information about the ltp mailing list