[LTP] [PATCH] shmctl01: don't use hardcoded index == 0 for SHM_STAT test

[Jan Stancek]

----- Original Message -----
> Hi Jan, Cyril,
> 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > Hi!
> > > > +static void func_sstat_setup(void)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	struct shm_info tmp;
> > > > +	int ret;
> > > > +
> > > > +	ret = shmctl(shm_id_1, SHM_INFO, (void *)&tmp);
> > > > +	if (ret < 0)
> > > > +		tst_resm(TFAIL|TERRNO, "shmctl(SHM_INFO)");
> 
> > > I wonder if it makes sense to continue here if shmctl() has failed,
> > > maybe we should do tst_brkm(TBROK ...) instead.
> 
> > It is 'setup phase', but it also is kind-of test for shmctl() as well.
> > We don't risk much if we continue, worst case is we get one more fail.
> 
> > @Petr: Do you have any preference?
> Cyril's point makes sense, but I prefer Jan's way.

I pushed TFAIL version.

Thanks for review,
Jan

> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> Petr
>