[LTP] [PATCH 01/10] lib: Introduce more TEST_* macros

[Cyril Hrubis]

Hi!
> > Is anyone against pushing this initial patchset as it is?
> >
> 
> Another bit of concern I have is the TEST_FAIL might cause
> confusion in code reading. It looks like the test will be failed here
> but in finish the test report pass, maybe we'd better tell people the
> failure is expected?
> (that was just my feeling on TEST_FAIL at the first glance)
> 
> Or rename them to:
> 
> TEST_EXP_PASS
> TEST_EXP_FAIL
> TEST_EXP_FD

Fair enough, let's rename them like this.

Any other concerns?

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz