[LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] msgget03: don't depend on existed shared resources

[xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com]

Hi Cyril, Petr
> Hi Petr
>> Hi all,
>>
>>> Hi Cyril, Petr
>>>> Hi!
>>>>>> I think that we allready discussed this in another thread:
>>
>>>>>> https://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2021-July/023831.html
>>
>>>>> Thanks, I forgot this. In that case my approach (not using<=, but
>>>>> count
>>>>> segments in /proc/sysvipc/shm before testing) might be more precise.
>>>>> But no strong feeling about that, both solutions fix the test,
>>>>> let's chose one
>>>>> and merge.
>>
>>>> As I said previously, there are many SysV IPC tests that do expect that
>>>> nobody will add/remove IPC shm/queue/semaphores during the testrun and
>>>> some of the testcases cannot even be implemented without this
>>>> expectation.
>>
>>>> Hence I wouldn't complicate the test here and just count how many
>>>> segments are there at the start and be done with it.
>>> Agree.
>>
>>> A possible solution(alter get_used_queues api in new ipc lib and add
>>> file parametrers, so we can use this api for msgget03) I have mentioned
>>> in the previous email, the url as below:
>>> https://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2021-July/023653.html
>> LGTM. Or use /proc/sysvipc/shm instead of /proc/sysvipc/msg in
>> get_used_queues()
>> as you noted get_used_queues() has not been used yet.
> I rename get_used_queues to get_used_sysvipc_cnt. see attached patch.
Any idea about the attached patch(it was in previous eamil)?

ps:more and more people sent patch to fix this problme, I don't want to 
see many patches for this problem. Let's choose a solution to fix this 
problem.

Best Regards
Yang Xu
>>
>> BTW searching where get_used_queues() appeared, I see [LTP] [PATCH v3
>> 1/4]
>> syscalls/ipc: add newipc library for new API [1], but if I'm not mistaken
>> get_used_queues() was not used even there, maybe it was in some previous
>> versions.
> Yes, no new api case use GET_USED_QUEUES api.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Petr
>>
>> [1] https://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2016-December/003239.html
>