[LTP] [PATCH v2] statvfs01: Convert to new LTP API

Avinesh Kumar akumar@suse.de
Thu Dec 1 09:51:38 CET 2022


Hi Petr,

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 3:20:37 PM IST Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> ...
> > > +static struct tst_test test = {
> > > +	.test_all = run,
> > > +	.setup = setup,
> > > +	.needs_root = 1,
> > > +	.mount_device = 1,
> > > +	.mntpoint = MNT_POINT,
> > > +	.all_filesystems = 1,
> > > +	.skip_filesystems = (const char *const[]) {
> > > +		"vfat",
> > > +		"exfat",
> > I was looking what's wrong with vfat and exfat.
> > statvfs.f_namemax returns 1530, which is obviously too long, thus valid_fname
> > obviously returns ENAMETOOLONG (36). Tested on 6.1.0-rc6-1.g4c01546-default.
> > I wonder why, isn't that a bug?
> 
> To reply myself, both glibc and musl defines:
> statvfs->f_namemax = statfs->f_namelen;
> 
> TL;DR: 6 * 255 = 1530 due names being in UTF-8:
> 
> Therefore looking into kernel sources for statfs->f_namelen:
> 
> include/linux/nls.h
> #define NLS_MAX_CHARSET_SIZE 6 /* for UTF-8 */
> 
> === exfat ===
> exfat/exfat_raw.h
> #define EXFAT_MAX_FILE_LEN 255
> 
> exfat/super.c
> static int exfat_statfs(struct dentry *dentry, struct kstatfs *buf)
> {
> 	...
>     /* Unicode utf16 255 characters */
>     buf->f_namelen = EXFAT_MAX_FILE_LEN * NLS_MAX_CHARSET_SIZE;
> 
> === vfat ===
> include/uapi/linux/msdos_fs.h
> #define FAT_LFN_LEN 255     /* maximum long name length */
> 
> fat/inode.c
> static int fat_statfs(struct dentry *dentry, struct kstatfs *buf)
> {
> 	...
>     buf->f_namelen =
>         (sbi->options.isvfat ? FAT_LFN_LEN : 12) * NLS_MAX_CHARSET_SIZE;
> 
> => i.e. for vfat without long filename support it'd be 72.
> 
> How about
> 1) don't skip exfat and vfat but just skip creating file with valid name? or
> 
> 2) Add #define NLS_MAX_CHARSET_SIZE 6 and for vfat and exfat calculate
> length as: buf.f_namemax / NLS_MAX_CHARSET_SIZE - 1 ?
> 
> Kind regards,
> Petr
> 

Thank you for the review and research on vfat, exfat scenarios.
I have adopted the option 1 for now and sent a v3 of this patch.


Regards,
Avinesh






More information about the ltp mailing list