[LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/pipe08: Remove the test

Avinesh Kumar akumar@suse.de
Wed Aug 2 11:25:39 CEST 2023


Hi Cyril, Petr,

On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 4:09:43 PM IST Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > This test scenario of verifying SIGPIPE signal is being covered in
> > syscalls/write05.c test.
> 
> Hmm, this one is actually hard to figure out. Indeed the write test
> implmenents the SIGPIPE case, however it would make more sense to have
> the SIGPIPE test in syscalls/pipe/ directory instead. I guess that any
> kernel developer that would like to use LTP for testing changes in
> pipe() implementation would rather want to have the test under pipe/
> directory.
> 
> Maybe we should keep the pipe08 test and remove the case from the
> write05 test instead? Or should we keep both?

Thank you for your feedback. Now I too think we can keep both, but you guys 
can decide. Please let me know, I can send the patch for pipe08 to convert to 
new API if we decide to keep it.

--
Regards,
Avinesh







More information about the ltp mailing list