[LTP] [PATCH] io_uring: enable I/O Uring before testing

Li Wang liwang@redhat.com
Wed Aug 9 03:46:54 CEST 2023


Hi Jeff,

Thanks for comments.

On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 9:17 PM Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> wrote:

> Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > Given that the upstream kernel is going to introduce io_uring_disabled
> > knob which disables the creation of new io_uring instances system-wide.
> >
> > The new sysctl is designed to let a user with root on the machine
> > enable and disable io_uring system-wide at runtime without requiring
> > a kernel recompilation or a reboot.
> >
> > See:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/io-uring/patch/20230630151003.3622786-2-matteorizzo@google.com/
> >
> > Without this patch, LTP/io_uring test complains:
> >
> >   io_uring01.c:82: TFAIL: io_uring_setup() failed: EPERM (1)
> >   io_uring02.c:213: TBROK: io_uring_setup() failed: EPERM (1)
>
> Just to be clear, with the above kernel patch applied io_uring is
> enabled by default.  You shouldn't need to set the sysctl parameter
> unless io_uring is explicitly disabled by the administrator (that can be
> accomplished via the kernel command line, sysfs, or via sysctl.conf).
>

Yes, but it won't be harmful to set the parameter even if it's enabled by
default,
LTP uses save_restore field to manage sysfs knob unified, it guarantees the
tests can really get performed whatever io_uring is enabled or disabled.

I would keep the patch as it is unless you insist or others have an
objection.



>
> Cheers,
> Jeff
>
> >
> > Reproted-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_uring/io_uring01.c | 5 +++++
> >  testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_uring/io_uring02.c | 5 +++++
> >  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_uring/io_uring01.c
> b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_uring/io_uring01.c
> > index 70151bb85..ab1ec00d6 100644
> > --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_uring/io_uring01.c
> > +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_uring/io_uring01.c
> > @@ -264,5 +264,10 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
> >       .bufs = (struct tst_buffers []) {
> >               {&iov, .iov_sizes = (int[]){BLOCK_SZ, -1}},
> >               {}
> > +     },
> > +     .save_restore = (const struct tst_path_val[]) {
> > +             {"/proc/sys/kernel/io_uring_disabled", "0",
> > +                     TST_SR_SKIP_MISSING | TST_SR_TCONF_RO},
> > +             {}
> >       }
> >  };
> > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_uring/io_uring02.c
> b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_uring/io_uring02.c
> > index c5c770074..c9d4bbcb1 100644
> > --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_uring/io_uring02.c
> > +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_uring/io_uring02.c
> > @@ -255,6 +255,11 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
> >               TST_CAP(TST_CAP_REQ, CAP_SYS_CHROOT),
> >               {}
> >       },
> > +     .save_restore = (const struct tst_path_val[]) {
> > +             {"/proc/sys/kernel/io_uring_disabled", "0",
> > +                     TST_SR_SKIP_MISSING | TST_SR_TCONF_RO},
> > +             {}
> > +     },
> >       .tags = (const struct tst_tag[]) {
> >               {"linux-git", "9392a27d88b9"},
> >               {"linux-git", "ff002b30181d"},
>
>

-- 
Regards,
Li Wang


More information about the ltp mailing list