[LTP] [PATCH 6.1 00/15] 6.1.48-rc1 review

[Harshit Mogalapalli]

Hi

On 25/08/23 2:18 pm, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 13:57, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 12:35:46PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>>> + linux-nfs and more
>>>
>>> On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 at 19:45, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>>> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.48 release.
>>>> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>>> let me know.
>>>>
>>>> Responses should be made by Sat, 26 Aug 2023 14:14:28 +0000.
>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>>
>>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>>>          https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.48-rc1.gz
>>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>>>          git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
>>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>>
>>>> greg k-h
>>>
>>>
>>> Following test regression found on stable-rc 6.1.
>>> Rpi4 is using NFS mount rootfs and running LTP syscalls testing.
>>> chown02 tests creating testfile2 on NFS mounted and validating
>>> the functionality and found that it was a failure.
>>>
>>> This is already been reported by others on lore and fix patch merged
>>> into stable-rc linux-6.4.y [1] and [2].
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
>>
>> Odd, it's not a regression in this -rc cycle, so it was missed in the
>> previous ones somehow?
>>
>>> Test log:
>>> --------
>>> chown02.c:46: TPASS: chown(testfile1, 0, 0) passed
>>> chown02.c:46: TPASS: chown(testfile2, 0, 0) passed
>>> chown02.c:58: TFAIL: testfile2: wrong mode permissions 0100700, expected 0102700
>>>
>>> fchown02.c:57: TPASS: fchown(3, 0, 0) passed
>>> fchown02.c:57: TPASS: fchown(4, 0, 0) passed
>>> fchown02.c:67: TFAIL: testfile2: wrong mode permissions 0100700,
>>> expected 0102700
>>>
>>>
>>> ## Build
>>> * kernel: 6.1.48-rc1
>>> * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
>>> * git branch: linux-6.1.y
>>> * git commit: c079d0dd788ad4fe887ee6349fe89d23d72f7696
>>> * git describe: v6.1.47-16-gc079d0dd788a
>>> * test details:
>>> https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.47-16-gc079d0dd788a
>>>
>>> ## Test Regressions (compared to v6.1.46)
>>> * bcm2711-rpi-4-b, ltp-syscalls
>>>    - chown02
>>>    - fchown02
>>>
>>> * bcm2711-rpi-4-b-64k_page_size, ltp-syscalls
>>>    - chown02
>>>    - fchown02
>>>
>>> * bcm2711-rpi-4-b-clang, ltp-syscalls
>>>    - chown02
>>>    - fchown02
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Do we need the following patch into stable-rc linux-6.1.y ?
>>>
>>> I see from mailing thread discussion, says that
>>>
>>> the above commit is backported to LTS kernels -- 5.10.y,5.15.y and 6.1.y.
>>
>> What "above commit"?
> 
> Sorry, s/above/below/
> I copied that from another email thread as it is.
> 
>>
>> And what commit should be backported?
> 
> 
>    nfsd: use vfs setgid helper
>      commit 2d8ae8c417db284f598dffb178cc01e7db0f1821 upstream.
> 

I have tried backporting this on 6.1.y and 5.15.y.

Here are the backports. (note: I would like to have them reviewed)

6.1.y: 
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230825161603.371792-1-harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com/

5.15.y: 
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230825161901.371818-1-harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com/


Thanks,
Harshit
> Please refer this link,
>   - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20230502-agenda-regeln-04d2573bd0fd@brauner/
> 
> 
>>
>> confused,
>>
>> greg k-h