[LTP] [PATCH 0/2] Improve ioprio tests

[Niklas Cassel]

On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 11:16:49AM +0200, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 11:13:16AM +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > Hi Damien,
> > 
> > > The ioprio syscall tests rely on ltp internal definitions of the
> > > IOPRIO_XXX() macro defining priority classes and levels. With changes
> > > to the ioprio API to support command duration limits, these internal
> > > definitions are incomplete, causing test case ioprio_set03 to fail.
> > 
> > > Avoid this issue by having the iprio tests use the kernel header file
> > > definitions if that header exists. This enables additional checks in
> > > the header file [1] which restores the expected results with test
> > > ioprio_set03.
> > 
> > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20230530061307.525644-1-dlemoal@kernel.org/
> > 
> > > Note: a review of this patch on the kernel block mailing list would be
> > > very appreciated.
> > 
> > I haven't found this patchset on https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/,
> > did you send it there?
> 
> Hello Petr,
> 
> The patch series for LTP can be found here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/20230608005315.3703446-1-dlemoal@kernel.org/T/#t
> 
> I just checked LTP master, and it hasn't been applied by the
> LTP maintainers yet.
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> Niklas

Oh, and in case you were referring to the prerequisite kernel patch,
it is already in linux-next:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkp/scsi.git/commit/?h=staging&id=01584c1e233740519d0e11aa20daa323d26bf598

So right now we are just waiting for the LTP patch series to get picked up.


Kind regards,
Niklas