[LTP] [PATCH] sched: add sched sysctl sanity test

Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz
Fri Sep 1 16:44:33 CEST 2023


Currently the test fails due to kernel bug, I will send patch to LKML
later on.

The problem with kernel is that sysctl_sched_rt_period is unsigned int
but it's processed with proc_dointvec() which means that you are allowed
to write negative values into the variable even though documentation
says it shouldn't be possible and the kernel code asserts that rt_period
is > 0.

Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
---
 runtest/sched                                 |   2 +
 testcases/kernel/sched/sysctl/.gitignore      |   1 +
 testcases/kernel/sched/sysctl/Makefile        |   7 ++
 .../kernel/sched/sysctl/proc_sched_rt01.c     | 115 ++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 125 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/sched/sysctl/.gitignore
 create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/sched/sysctl/Makefile
 create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/sched/sysctl/proc_sched_rt01.c

diff --git a/runtest/sched b/runtest/sched
index 172fe4174..3457114f4 100644
--- a/runtest/sched
+++ b/runtest/sched
@@ -16,3 +16,5 @@ sched_cli_serv run_sched_cliserv.sh
 sched_stress sched_stress.sh
 
 autogroup01 autogroup01
+
+proc_sched_rt01
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/sched/sysctl/.gitignore b/testcases/kernel/sched/sysctl/.gitignore
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..29b859b81
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testcases/kernel/sched/sysctl/.gitignore
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+proc_sched_rt01
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/sched/sysctl/Makefile b/testcases/kernel/sched/sysctl/Makefile
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..18896b6f2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testcases/kernel/sched/sysctl/Makefile
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+
+top_srcdir		?= ../../../..
+
+include $(top_srcdir)/include/mk/testcases.mk
+
+include $(top_srcdir)/include/mk/generic_leaf_target.mk
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/sched/sysctl/proc_sched_rt01.c b/testcases/kernel/sched/sysctl/proc_sched_rt01.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..b30256792
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testcases/kernel/sched/sysctl/proc_sched_rt01.c
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
+ */
+
+/*\
+ * [Description]
+ *
+ * Sanity tests for the /proc/sys/kernel/sched_r* files.
+ *
+ * - The sched_rt_period_us range is 1 to INT_MAX
+ *   try invalid values and check for EINVAL
+ *
+ * - The sched_rt_runtime_us range is -1 to INT_MAX
+ *   try invalid values and check for EINVAL
+ *
+ * - The sched_rt_runtime_us must be less or equal to sched_rt_period_us
+ *
+ * - Reset sched_rr_timeslice_ms to default value by writing -1 and check that
+ *   we get the default value on next read.
+ *
+ *   This is a regression test for a commit:
+ *
+ *   commit c1fc6484e1fb7cc2481d169bfef129a1b0676abe
+ *   Author: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
+ *   Date:   Wed Aug 2 17:19:06 2023 +0200
+ *
+ *       sched/rt: sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice show default timeslice after reset
+ */
+
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include "tst_test.h"
+
+#define RT_PERIOD_US "/proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_period_us"
+#define RT_RUNTIME_US "/proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_runtime_us"
+#define RR_TIMESLICE_MS "/proc/sys/kernel/sched_rr_timeslice_ms"
+
+static int period_fd;
+static int runtime_fd;
+
+static void rr_timeslice_ms_reset(void)
+{
+	long timeslice_ms;
+
+	SAFE_FILE_PRINTF(RR_TIMESLICE_MS, "-1");
+	SAFE_FILE_SCANF(RR_TIMESLICE_MS, "%li", &timeslice_ms);
+
+	TST_EXP_EXPR(timeslice_ms > 0,
+	             "timeslice_ms > 0 after reset to default");
+}
+
+static void rt_period_us_einval(void)
+{
+	TST_EXP_FAIL(write(period_fd, "0", 2), EINVAL,
+	             "echo 0 > "RT_PERIOD_US);
+	TST_EXP_FAIL(write(period_fd, "-1", 2), EINVAL,
+	             "echo -1 > "RT_PERIOD_US);
+}
+
+static void rt_runtime_us_einval(void)
+{
+	TST_EXP_FAIL(write(runtime_fd, "-2", 2), EINVAL,
+	             "echo -2 > "RT_RUNTIME_US);
+}
+
+static void rt_runtime_us_le_period_us(void)
+{
+	int period_us;
+	char buf[32];
+
+	SAFE_FILE_SCANF(RT_PERIOD_US, "%i", &period_us);
+
+	sprintf(buf, "%i", period_us+1);
+
+	TST_EXP_FAIL(write(runtime_fd, buf, strlen(buf)), EINVAL,
+	             "echo rt_period_us+1 > "RT_RUNTIME_US);
+}
+
+static void verify_sched_proc(void)
+{
+	rr_timeslice_ms_reset();
+	rt_period_us_einval();
+	rt_runtime_us_einval();
+	rt_runtime_us_le_period_us();
+}
+
+static void setup(void)
+{
+	period_fd = open(RT_PERIOD_US, O_RDWR);
+	runtime_fd = open(RT_RUNTIME_US, O_RDWR);
+}
+
+static void cleanup(void)
+{
+	if (period_fd > 0)
+		SAFE_CLOSE(period_fd);
+
+	if (runtime_fd > 0)
+		SAFE_CLOSE(runtime_fd);
+}
+
+static struct tst_test test = {
+	.needs_root = 1,
+	.setup = setup,
+	.cleanup = cleanup,
+	.test_all = verify_sched_proc,
+	.tags = (struct tst_tag []) {
+		{"linux-git", "c1fc6484e1fb"},
+		{}
+	},
+	.needs_kconfigs = (const char *[]) {
+		"CONFIG_SYSCTL",
+		NULL
+	},
+};
-- 
2.41.0



More information about the ltp mailing list