[gpm][PATCH] 1.20.0-clean_fix

[Alessandro Rubini]

> Well, I consider it part if development toolchain, that is people who
> compile gpm themselves can be expected to have makeinfo imnsho.
> 
> A 'clean' source package shouldn't carry such files, nor do most of them.

The "previous" behaviour was to have output documentation in the
tarball but not in CVS.  "make clean" didn't remove docs, I think,
while "make cleanest" did.

When I began shipping gpm, years ago, I didn't distribute compiled
code.  Then a lot of users complained about errors when trying to
"make" from source, since they didn't have TeX installed.  I think
several people is going to hack mice.c, even people with no TeX
installed.  Actually, several more know C than TeX. On the other
hand, who uses CVS is more knowledgeable, on average.

My vote is for going the old way, FWIW.