[gpm] What is going on with GPM sources/copyright?
Enrico Weigelt
weigelt@metux.de
Sat May 8 19:06:42 CEST 2010
* Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
> But you are certainly loose in cases when some parts of the code
> can be inlined and/or eliminated - compiler can't make this
> decision when you split everything apart and everything is extern.
Okay, inlining an local calls is a valid argument. Feel free to
analyze it a bit deeper and maybe provide patches :)
> > Why not just having it all in one AUTHORS file ?
> >
>
> A person may have copyright interest in just a part of the project,
> not the whole thing.
Did this ever happen in this project ?
cu
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
http://patches.metux.de/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the gpm
mailing list