[LTP] [RFC] Getting rid of cleanup parameter
Jan Stancek
jstancek@redhat.com
Wed Nov 11 11:20:58 CET 2015
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cyril Hrubis" <chrubis@suse.cz>
> To: ltp@lists.linux.it
> Sent: Tuesday, 10 November, 2015 3:14:26 PM
> Subject: [LTP] [RFC] Getting rid of cleanup parameter
>
> Hi!
> I was looking into the LTP API expecially the tst_res* part to make it
> cleaner and easier to use and one of the things I would like to change
> is how we execute the cleanup function.
>
> Currenlty we pass the cleanup as function parameter. The 99% of the time
> we just pass the very same function to every call with the exception of
> the calls in the cleanup function itself. And the callback function is
> made in a way that it could be called at any point in the setup() as
> well.
>
> The common mistakes with that API is that people pass cleanup() paramter
> to functions in cleanup() and to tst api in child processes. But as we
> use it now the cleanup can be set exactly once and called from the test
> library which could make sure that it's called exactly once, etc.
>
> So my proposal is to add a call to set cleanup function,
> tst_set_cleanup(void (*cleanup)(void)) that would be called once in the
> setup and would store the function pointer, which would later be called
> either when test exits prematurely or on tst_exit().
Just thinking loud, how this would work:
Is the scope of cleanup set with tst_set_cleanup() going to be per process?
For example: If I call tst_set_cleanup() and then fork couple children,
will they automatically ignore cleanup function set in parent?
Can I use tst_set_cleanup() in child process to setup child-specific
cleanup function?
> When the cleanup
> function was set with this interface the cleanup paramter for all
> functions would be ignored (we may create static inline wrappers that
> sets it to NULL to be used from new code).
And perhaps trigger a warning/TBROK if user tries to pass non-NULL
value while he's using the new tst_set_cleanup() approach.
Regards,
Jan
>
> Does everybody agree with this change?
>
> --
> Cyril Hrubis
> chrubis@suse.cz
>
> --
> Mailing list info: http://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
>
More information about the Ltp
mailing list