[LTP] [PATCHv3 3/3] network/stress/icmp: use ip xfrm for icmp4-uni-basic01 ipsec testing

Hangbin Liu haliu@redhat.com
Wed Apr 6 09:52:17 CEST 2016


Hi,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 03:41:36PM +0300, Alexey Kodanev wrote:
> >Does it looks like
> >
> >icmp4-uni-basic01 icmp-uni-basic
> >icmp4-uni-basic02 DO_IPSEC=true IPSEC_PROTO=ah IPSEC_MODE=transport ICMP_SIZE_ARRAY="10 100 1000 10000 65483"; icmp-uni-basic
> >...
> >icmp6-uni-basic01 icmp-uni-basic -6
> >icmp6-uni-basic02 DO_IPSEC=true IPSEC_PROTO=ah IPSEC_MODE=transport ICMP_SIZE_ARRAY="10 100 1000 10000 65503"; icmp-uni-basic -6
> 
> Or something like network/virt_lib.sh does with getopts, so instead of
> setting
> environment variables we would have easy to look at runtest lines, e.g.:
> 
> icmp6-uni-basic01 icmp-uni-basic -6
> icmp6-uni-basic02 icmp-uni-basic -6 -p ah -m transport -s "10 100 1000 10000 65503"

OK, I will try this way

> >>I still think we should add it to the library. tst_ping replaces
> >>'icmp4/6_check_connectivity'. And adding variable message size there,
> >>will replace ns-echoclient library tool.
> >I did't find icmp4/6_check_connectivity will do icmp msg_size check. But anyway,
> >here is a msg_sizes version. how do you think? should we use ROD ping... directly?
> 
> It's in "ns-echoclient".

ns-echoclient only ping remote but do not check the return status.

> 
> About ROD in tst_ping()... may be we shouldn't use it here. It's quite
> simple
> to call "ROD tst_ping" anyway.
> 
> Also I'm not sure we won't have tests that pass on failed ping. For example,
> vxlan tests set different IDs and check that there is no connectivity. In
> this particular cases,
> the test shouldn't exit with TBROK but return TPASS status. We could simply
> return ping
> status here and let test to decide what to do next.

Here comes back the old discuss. tst_ping is used for check connectivity. If
we use msg_sizes="10 100 1000 10000 65530" and failed when send msg_size
10000 and return -1. How the test know which msg size failed? That's the
reason I feel we should let tst_ping check one msg_size each time.

Thanks
Hangbin

> 
> >
> >tst_ping()
> >{
> >         # The max number of ICMP echo request
> >         PING_MAX=${PING_MAX:-"10"}
> >
> >         local src_iface=${1:-"$(tst_iface)"}
> >         local dst_addr=${2:-"$(tst_ipaddr rhost)"}
> >         # ping cmd use 56 as default message size
> >         local msg_sizes=${3:-"56"}
> 
> local msg_sizes=${@:3}
> 
> for size in ${msg_sizes:-"56"}; do
>     ping...
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Alexey
> 
> >
> >         for size in $msg_sizes; do
> >                 ping$TST_IPV6 -I $src_iface -c $PING_MAX $dst_addr \
> >                         -s $msg_size > /dev/null 2>&1
> >                 if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
> >                         tst_brkm TBROK "There is no IPv${IP_VER:-4} connectivity with msg_size $msg_size"
> >                 else
> >                         tst_resm TPASS "There is IPv${IP_VER:-4} connectivity with msg_size $msg_size"
> >                 fi
> >         done
> >}
> >
> >Thanks & Best Regards
> >Hangbin Liu
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

-- 

Thanks & Best Regards
Hangbin Liu <haliu@redhat.com>
Leo on #kernel-qe, #kernel, #eng-china


More information about the ltp mailing list