[LTP] [PATCH] ptrace/ptrace05: preventing kill other processes if fork failed
Han Pingtian
hanpt@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Tue Apr 12 15:19:05 CEST 2016
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 12:08:59PM +0200, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
> > If fork failed, we should try next signum. Or the kill(-1, 9) on line
> > 196 will kill a lot of processes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Han Pingtian <hanpt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace05.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace05.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace05.c
> > index d610cc0..e717319 100644
> > --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace05.c
> > +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace05.c
> > @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> > switch (child = fork()) {
> > case -1:
> > tst_resm(TBROK | TERRNO, "Failed to fork properly.");
> > - break;
> > + continue;
>
> I would just change this to tst_brkm(). There is no point in continuing
> the test if fork() starts failing.
>
Please review the new patch. Thanks.
>From ee7ba40a79644a9039d0cc581f78e8708aef8b06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Han Pingtian <hanpt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:13:57 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] ptrace/ptrace05: preventing kill other processes if fork
failed
If fork failed, we should try next signum. Or the kill(-1, 9) on line
196 will kill a lot of processes.
Signed-off-by: Han Pingtian <hanpt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace05.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace05.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace05.c
index d610cc0..db611e7 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace05.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace05.c
@@ -98,8 +98,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
switch (child = fork()) {
case -1:
- tst_resm(TBROK | TERRNO, "Failed to fork properly.");
- break;
+ tst_brkm(TBROK | TERRNO, NULL,
+ "Failed to fork properly.");
case 0:
if (ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME, 0, NULL, NULL) != -1) {
--
1.9.3
More information about the ltp
mailing list