[LTP] Issue with the reporting of failed tests
Mason
slash.tmp@free.fr
Thu Apr 21 16:47:55 CEST 2016
On 21/04/2016 15:25, Mason wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For a particular LTP run, I had 97 reported failures.
>
> $ grep -c FAIL result-log.987
> 97
>
> However, FAILCMDFILE contained 804 lines (with many duplicates).
>
> $ wc -l result-failed.987
> 804 result-failed.987
>
> $ sort result-failed.987 | uniq | wc -l
> 85
>
> It seems some failures did not get recorded in FAILCMDFILE at all,
> or were recorded, but later overwritten:
> aio01, aio02, cgroup, controllers, ext4*, fs_racer, Numa-testcases
> and some of the cron tests.
>
>
> As discussed with metan on IRC, this has all the symptoms of a
> FILE buffer shared between parent and child process. I am now
> running LTP again with the following patch applied:
>
> diff --git a/pan/ltp-pan.c b/pan/ltp-pan.c
> index cee71aa3b587..44c026e88a47 100644
> --- a/pan/ltp-pan.c
> +++ b/pan/ltp-pan.c
> @@ -535,6 +535,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> break;
> }
>
> + fflush(failcmdfile);
> cpid =
> run_child(coll->ary[c], running + i, quiet_mode,
> &failcnt, fmt_print, logfile);
>
>
> When the run finishes, I will be able to tell if the issue remains.
Calling fflush does appear to solve the problem:
# grep -c FAIL result-log.5160
38
# wc -l result-failed.5160
38 result-failed.5160
Does this mean no one ever reads FAILCMDFILE?!
Regards.
More information about the ltp
mailing list