[LTP] Issue with the reporting of failed tests

Mason slash.tmp@free.fr
Thu Apr 21 16:47:55 CEST 2016


On 21/04/2016 15:25, Mason wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> For a particular LTP run, I had 97 reported failures.
> 
> $ grep -c FAIL result-log.987
> 97
> 
> However, FAILCMDFILE contained 804 lines (with many duplicates).
> 
> $ wc -l result-failed.987
> 804 result-failed.987
> 
> $ sort result-failed.987 | uniq | wc -l
> 85
> 
> It seems some failures did not get recorded in FAILCMDFILE at all,
> or were recorded, but later overwritten:
> aio01, aio02, cgroup, controllers, ext4*, fs_racer, Numa-testcases
> and some of the cron tests.
> 
> 
> As discussed with metan on IRC, this has all the symptoms of a
> FILE buffer shared between parent and child process. I am now
> running LTP again with the following patch applied:
> 
> diff --git a/pan/ltp-pan.c b/pan/ltp-pan.c
> index cee71aa3b587..44c026e88a47 100644
> --- a/pan/ltp-pan.c
> +++ b/pan/ltp-pan.c
> @@ -535,6 +535,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>                                 break;
>                         }
>  
> +                       fflush(failcmdfile);
>                         cpid =
>                             run_child(coll->ary[c], running + i, quiet_mode,
>                                       &failcnt, fmt_print, logfile);
> 
> 
> When the run finishes, I will be able to tell if the issue remains.

Calling fflush does appear to solve the problem:

# grep -c FAIL result-log.5160
38

# wc -l result-failed.5160
38 result-failed.5160

Does this mean no one ever reads FAILCMDFILE?!

Regards.


More information about the ltp mailing list