[LTP] [PATCH] fcntl.2: F_OFD_XXX needs flock64
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
Tue Aug 16 16:34:53 CEST 2016
Hi!
> If we pass struct flock to the F_OFD_XXX fcntl() it will fail with
> EINVAL with a 32bit binary. That is because glibc uses fcntl64() by
> default but the struct flock uses 32bit off_t for 32bit binaries (unless
> _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64) and kernel always expect flock64 for F_OFD_XXX in
> fcntl64(). Hence kernel will read some garbage that is a few bytes after
> the 32bit flock structure in this case which will likely end up with the
> syscall returning EINVAL.
Here is also a commit that fixes the corresponding LTP testcase:
https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/commit/ae09800dfed8630f67796501bef3a88bb4fd3daa
Before this the fcntl34 test was failing on 32bit platform or with
CFLAGS=-m32 LDFLAGS=-m32 passed to configure.
Before:
testcases/kernel/syscalls/fcntl $./fcntl34
tst_test.c:756: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
fcntl34.c:104: INFO: write to a file inside threads with OFD locks
fcntl34.c:48: INFO: spawning '12' threads
fcntl34.c:79: BROK: fcntl() failed: EINVAL
Summary:
passed 0
failed 0
skipped 0
warnings 0
After:
testcases/kernel/syscalls/fcntl $./fcntl34
tst_test.c:756: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
fcntl34.c:104: INFO: write to a file inside threads with OFD locks
fcntl34.c:48: INFO: spawning '12' threads
fcntl34.c:57: INFO: waiting for '12' threads
fcntl34.c:113: INFO: verifying file's data
fcntl34.c:141: PASS: OFD locks synchronized access between threads
Summary:
passed 1
failed 0
skipped 0
warnings 0
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
More information about the ltp
mailing list