[LTP] [PATCH V2] Use a union of sigval instead of sigval_t

[Jan Stancek]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Khem Raj" <raj.khem@gmail.com>
> To: ltp@lists.linux.it
> Sent: Thursday, 7 January, 2016 1:25:16 PM
> Subject: [LTP] [PATCH V2] Use a union of sigval instead of sigval_t
> 
> sigval_t is glibc only construct, we use a union of sigval
> which pretty much is same effect as sigval_t
> 
> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>

Looks good to me, I think this should be safe to apply before release.
(I tested it across RHEL5.6/6.0/7.0)

Cyril, do you agree?

Regards,
Jan

> ---
>  lib/tlibio.c | 5 +----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/tlibio.c b/lib/tlibio.c
> index 6b6103f..7b6bb33 100644
> --- a/lib/tlibio.c
> +++ b/lib/tlibio.c
> @@ -130,9 +130,6 @@
>  #endif
>  
>  static void lio_async_signal_handler();
> -#ifdef sgi
> -static void lio_async_callback_handler();
> -#endif
>  
>  /*
>   * Define the structure as used in lio_parse_arg1 and lio_help1
> @@ -441,7 +438,7 @@ static void lio_async_signal_handler(int sig)
>   * If the handler is called, it will increment the Received_callback
>   * global variable.
>   ***********************************************************************/
> -static void lio_async_callback_handler(sigval_t sigval)
> +static void lio_async_callback_handler(union sigval sigval)
>  {
>  	if (Debug_level)
>  		printf
> --
> 2.7.0
> 
> 
> --
> Mailing list info: http://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
>