[LTP] [PATCH v2] lib/tst_test.c: Run test in child process
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
Wed Jun 8 14:30:56 CEST 2016
Hi!
> > diff --git a/lib/tst_test.c b/lib/tst_test.c
> > index b8ec246..eef54e4 100644
> > --- a/lib/tst_test.c
> > +++ b/lib/tst_test.c
> > @@ -220,17 +220,19 @@ void tst_vres_(const char *file, const int lineno, int
> > ttype,
> > void tst_vbrk_(const char *file, const int lineno, int ttype,
> > const char *fmt, va_list va) __attribute__((noreturn));
> >
> > -static void do_cleanup(void);
> > +static void do_test_cleanup(void)
> > +{
> > + if (tst_test->cleanup)
> > + tst_test->cleanup();
> > +}
> >
> > void tst_vbrk_(const char *file, const int lineno, int ttype,
> > const char *fmt, va_list va)
> > {
> > print_result(file, lineno, ttype, fmt, va);
> >
> > - if (getpid() == main_pid) {
> > - do_cleanup();
> > - cleanup_ipc();
> > - }
> > + if (getpid() == main_pid)
> > + do_test_cleanup();
> >
>
> Not directly related to this patch, but I noticed that we don't
> seem to cleanup_ipc if we hit TBROK outside of main test pid.
The cleanup_ipc() is intended to be executed just before the main pid
exits since it unlinks the shm file. If child TBROKs it's catched in the
check_child_status() in the parent, tst_brk() is called which will call
the cleanup_ipc().
I guess that we may close and unmap the shm even in the children but
wouldn't that happen anyway as the process exits?
> > +void tst_run_tcases(int argc, char *argv[], struct tst_test *self)
> > +{
> > + int status;
> > + char *mul;
> > +
> > + tst_test = self;
> > + TCID = tst_test->tid;
> > +
> > + do_setup(argc, argv);
> > +
> > + if (tst_test->timeout)
> > + timeout = tst_test->timeout;
>
> Can you think of a testcase where we would want to disable timeout?
At the moment I do not remember a test that would need timeout to be
turned off. And if we find that it's necessary we can always disable in
case that tst_test->timeout < 0.
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
More information about the ltp
mailing list