[LTP] [PATCH] fanotify06: create a mount for test
Li Wang
liwang@redhat.com
Wed Jun 29 12:14:17 CEST 2016
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 10:49:11AM +0200, Jan Stancek wrote:
> This testcase can rarely fail, when there is a background process
> modifying files on same mountpoint as is LTP's tmpdir:
>
> fanotify06 1 TFAIL : fanotify06.c:212: group 0 got more than one event (48 > 24)
> fanotify06 2 TFAIL : fanotify06.c:212: group 1 got more than one event (48 > 24)
> fanotify06 3 TFAIL : fanotify06.c:212: group 2 got more than one event (48 > 24)
> fanotify06 4 TFAIL : fanotify06.c:222: group 3 got event
> fanotify06 5 TFAIL : fanotify06.c:222: group 4 got event
> fanotify06 6 TPASS : group 5 got no event
> fanotify06 7 TPASS : group 6 got no event
> fanotify06 8 TPASS : group 7 got no event
> fanotify06 9 TPASS : group 8 got no event
>
> This patch creates a mount, which should be only used by this
> test to limit interference from rest of OS. It also adds missing
> tst_require_root().
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
> ---
> testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify06.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify06.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify06.c
> index 93c960268b57..cdbc7a16c0d7 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify06.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify06.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
> #include <sys/fcntl.h>
> #include <errno.h>
> #include <string.h>
> +#include <sys/mount.h>
> #include <sys/syscall.h>
> #include "test.h"
> #include "linux_syscall_numbers.h"
> @@ -80,6 +81,9 @@ static int fd_notify[FANOTIFY_PRIORITIES][GROUPS_PER_PRIO];
>
> static char event_buf[EVENT_BUF_LEN];
>
> +#define MOUNT_NAME "mntpoint"
> +static int mount_created;
> +
> static void create_fanotify_groups(void)
> {
> unsigned int p, i;
> @@ -245,8 +249,15 @@ static void setup(void)
>
> TEST_PAUSE;
>
> + tst_require_root();
> tst_tmpdir();
>
> + SAFE_MKDIR(cleanup, MOUNT_NAME, 0755);
> + if (mount(MOUNT_NAME, MOUNT_NAME, NULL, MS_BIND, NULL) < 0)
why not SAFE_MOUNT() here?
SAFE_MOUNT(cleanup, MOUNT_NAME, MOUNT_NAME, NULL, MS_BIND, NULL);
> + tst_brkm(TBROK | TERRNO, cleanup, "bind mount failed");
> + mount_created = 1;
> + SAFE_CHDIR(cleanup, MOUNT_NAME);
> +
> sprintf(fname, "tfile_%d", getpid());
> fd = SAFE_OPEN(cleanup, fname, O_RDWR | O_CREAT, 0700);
> SAFE_WRITE(cleanup, 1, fd, fname, 1);
> @@ -258,6 +269,13 @@ static void setup(void)
> static void cleanup(void)
> {
> cleanup_fanotify_groups();
> +
> + if (chdir(tst_get_tmpdir()) < 0)
> + tst_brkm(TBROK, NULL, "chdir(tmpdir) failed");
> +
> + if (mount_created && tst_umount(MOUNT_NAME) < 0)
> + tst_brkm(TBROK | TERRNO, NULL, "umount failed");
> +
> tst_rmdir();
> }
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
>
> --
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
More information about the ltp
mailing list