[LTP] [PATCH v2] syscalls/recvmsg03.c: add new testcase
Xiao Yang
yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com
Wed Nov 2 06:34:51 CET 2016
Hi Cyril
Please ignore the v2 patch,i will resend it.
Thanks,
Xiao Yang
On 2016/11/01 10:24, Xiao Yang wrote:
> If the size of address for receiving data is set larger than actaul
> size, recvmsg() will set msg_namelen incorrectly and destroy sock_fd.
>
> This bug has been fixed by the following kernel patch:
> 'commit 06b6a1cf6e77 ("rds: set correct msg_namelen")'
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> runtest/syscalls | 1 +
> testcases/kernel/syscalls/.gitignore | 1 +
> testcases/kernel/syscalls/recvmsg/recvmsg03.c | 196 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 198 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/syscalls/recvmsg/recvmsg03.c
>
> diff --git a/runtest/syscalls b/runtest/syscalls
> index b781241..4c87f45 100644
> --- a/runtest/syscalls
> +++ b/runtest/syscalls
> @@ -869,6 +869,7 @@ recvfrom01 recvfrom01
>
> recvmsg01 recvmsg01
> recvmsg02 recvmsg02
> +recvmsg03 recvmsg03
>
> remap_file_pages01 remap_file_pages01
> remap_file_pages02 remap_file_pages02
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/.gitignore b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/.gitignore
> index f53cc05..1229720 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/.gitignore
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/.gitignore
> @@ -725,6 +725,7 @@
> /recvfrom/recvfrom01
> /recvmsg/recvmsg01
> /recvmsg/recvmsg02
> +/recvmsg/recvmsg03
> /remap_file_pages/remap_file_pages01
> /remap_file_pages/remap_file_pages02
> /removexattr/removexattr01
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/recvmsg/recvmsg03.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/recvmsg/recvmsg03.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..23ed23b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/recvmsg/recvmsg03.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,196 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright(c) 2016 Fujitsu Ltd.
> + * Author: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> + * under the terms of version 2 of the GNU General Public License as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful, but
> + * WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
> + *
> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> + * alone with this program.
> + */
> +
> +/*
> + * Test Name: recvmsg03
> + *
> + * This test needs that rds socket is supported by system.
> + * If the size of address for receiving data is set larger than actaul size,
> + * recvmsg() will set msg_namelen incorrectly and destroy sock_fd.
> + *
> + * Description:
> + * This is a regression test and has been fixed by kernel commit:
> + * 06b6a1cf6e776426766298d055bb3991957d90a7 (rds: set correct msg_namelen)
> + */
> +
> +#include <errno.h>
> +#include <sys/types.h>
> +#include <sys/socket.h>
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +
> +#include "tst_test.h"
> +
> +#ifndef AF_RDS
> +# define AF_RDS 21
> +#endif
> +
> +static int rds_flag;
> +
> +static void setup(void)
> +{
> + int acc_res, load_res;
> + const char *cmd[] = {"modprobe", "-i", "rds", NULL};
> +
> + acc_res = access("/proc/sys/net/rds", F_OK);
> + if (acc_res == -1 && errno != ENOENT)
> + tst_brk(TFAIL | TERRNO, "failed to check rds module");
> +
> + if (acc_res == -1 && errno == ENOENT) {
> + load_res = tst_run_cmd(cmd, NULL, NULL, 1);
> + if (load_res) {
> + tst_brk(TCONF, "failed to loaded rds module, "
> + "so rds modeule was not support by system");
> + }
> +
> + tst_res(TINFO, "succeeded to load rds module");
> + rds_flag = 1;
> + }
> +
> + tst_res(TINFO, "rds module was supported by system");
> +}
> +
> +static void cleanup(void)
> +{
> + int unload_res;
> + const char *cmd[] = {"modprobe", "-r", "rds", NULL};
> +
> + if (rds_flag == 1) {
> + unload_res = tst_run_cmd(cmd, NULL, NULL, 1);
> + if (unload_res)
> + tst_res(TWARN | TERRNO, "failed to unload rds module");
> + else
> + tst_res(TINFO, "succeeded to unload rds modules");
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void client(void)
> +{
> + int sock_fd1;
> + char send_buf[128] = "hello world";
> + struct sockaddr_in server_addr;
> + struct sockaddr_in to_addr;
> + struct msghdr msg;
> + struct iovec iov;
> +
> + sock_fd1 = SAFE_SOCKET(AF_RDS, SOCK_SEQPACKET, 0);
> +
> + memset(&server_addr, 0, sizeof(server_addr));
> + server_addr.sin_family = AF_INET;
> + server_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = inet_addr("127.0.0.1");
> + server_addr.sin_port = htons(4001);
> +
> + SAFE_BIND(sock_fd1, (struct sockaddr *) &server_addr, sizeof(server_addr));
> +
> + memset(&to_addr, 0, sizeof(to_addr));
> +
> + to_addr.sin_family = AF_INET;
> + to_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = inet_addr("127.0.0.1");
> + to_addr.sin_port = htons(4000);
> + msg.msg_name = &to_addr;
> + msg.msg_namelen = sizeof(to_addr);
> + msg.msg_iov = &iov;
> + msg.msg_iovlen = 1;
> + msg.msg_iov->iov_base = send_buf;
> + msg.msg_iov->iov_len = strlen(send_buf) + 1;
> + msg.msg_control = 0;
> + msg.msg_controllen = 0;
> + msg.msg_flags = 0;
> +
> + if (sendmsg(sock_fd1, &msg, 0) == -1) {
> + tst_brk(TFAIL | TERRNO,
> + "sendmsg() failed to send data to server");
> + }
> +
> + SAFE_CLOSE(sock_fd1);
> +}
> +
> +static void server(void)
> +{
> + int sock_fd, sock_fd2;
> + static char recv_buf[128];
> + struct sockaddr_in server_addr;
> + struct sockaddr_in from_addr;
> + struct msghdr msg;
> + struct iovec iov;
> +
> + sock_fd2 = SAFE_SOCKET(AF_RDS, SOCK_SEQPACKET, 0);
> + sock_fd = sock_fd2;
> +
> + memset(&server_addr, 0, sizeof(server_addr));
> + server_addr.sin_family = AF_INET;
> + server_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = inet_addr("127.0.0.1");
> + server_addr.sin_port = htons(4000);
> +
> + SAFE_BIND(sock_fd2, (struct sockaddr *) &server_addr, sizeof(server_addr));
> +
> + msg.msg_name = &from_addr;
> + msg.msg_namelen = sizeof(from_addr) + 16;
> + msg.msg_iov = &iov;
> + msg.msg_iovlen = 1;
> + msg.msg_iov->iov_base = recv_buf;
> + msg.msg_iov->iov_len = 128;
> + msg.msg_control = 0;
> + msg.msg_controllen = 0;
> + msg.msg_flags = 0;
> +
> + TST_CHECKPOINT_WAKE(0);
> +
> + TEST(recvmsg(sock_fd2, &msg, 0));
> + if (TEST_RETURN == -1) {
> + tst_res(TFAIL | TERRNO,
> + "recvmsg() failed to recvice data from client");
> + goto end;
> + }
> +
> + if (msg.msg_namelen != sizeof(from_addr)) {
> + tst_res(TFAIL, "msg_namelen was set to %u incorrectly, "
> + "expected %lu", msg.msg_namelen, sizeof(from_addr));
> + goto end;
> + }
> +
> + if (sock_fd2 != sock_fd) {
> + tst_res(TFAIL, "sock_fd was destroyed");
> + goto end;
> + }
> +
> + tst_res(TPASS, "msg_namelen was set to %u correctly and sock_fd was "
> + "not destroyed", msg.msg_namelen);
> +
> +end:
> + SAFE_CLOSE(sock_fd2);
> +}
> +
> +static void verify_recvmsg(void)
> +{
> + pid_t pid;
> +
> + pid = SAFE_FORK();
> + if (pid == 0) {
> + TST_CHECKPOINT_WAIT(0);
> + client();
> + } else {
> + server();
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static struct tst_test test = {
> + .tid = "recvmsg03",
> + .forks_child = 1,
> + .needs_checkpoints = 1,
> + .setup = setup,
> + .cleanup = cleanup,
> + .test_all = verify_recvmsg
> +};
More information about the ltp
mailing list