[LTP] [PATCH] [dynamic debug] - Check interface and functionality

Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz
Thu Aug 24 11:55:59 CEST 2017


Hi!
> I'm not convinced using EXPECT_* would be the same since I only want
> to report failures and these functions report both TPASS and TFAIL.
> On my machine, this setup produces additional 16k of not that useful
> lines (if something fails, you are still notified about it and know
> every line before it passed). Of course if you can think of a use case
> where having reports for every passed line would make sense I can do
> this change.

Right, haven't thought of that, yes adding 16k of useless output is not
something we want to do.

We may as well add EXPECT_PASS_SILENT or keep the code as it is...

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz


More information about the ltp mailing list