[LTP] [PATCH v3] syscalls/move_pages12: Add new regression test
Guangwen Feng
fenggw-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com
Mon Feb 13 05:11:53 CET 2017
Hi!
On 02/09/2017 06:56 PM, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
>> +#include "tst_test.h"
>> +#include "move_pages_support.h"
>> +
>> +#if HAVE_NUMA_MOVE_PAGES
>> +
>> +#define LOOPS 1000
>> +#define PATH_MEMINFO "/proc/meminfo"
>> +#define PATH_NR_HUGEPAGES "/proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages"
>> +#define PATH_HUGEPAGES "/sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/"
>> +#define TEST_PAGES 2
>> +#define TEST_NODES 2
>> +
>> +static int pgsz, hpsz;
>> +static long orig_hugepages;
>> +static unsigned int node1, node2;
>> +static void *addr;
>> +
>> +static void do_child(void)
>> +{
>> + int test_pages = TEST_PAGES * hpsz / pgsz;
>> + int i, j;
>> + int *nodes, *status;
>> + void **pages;
>> + pid_t ppid = getppid();
>> +
>> + pages = SAFE_MALLOC(sizeof(char *) * test_pages + 1);
>> + nodes = SAFE_MALLOC(sizeof(char *) * test_pages + 1);
>> + status = SAFE_MALLOC(sizeof(char *) * test_pages + 1);
>
> I know that this is taken from to original reproduced, but these
> allocations appears to be wrong. Both nodes and status are, as far as I
> can tell, arrays of integers, so this should in fact be:
>
> pages = SAFE_MALLOC(sizeof(char *) * test_pages);
> nodes = SAFE_MALLOC(sizeof(int) * test_pages);
> status = SAFE_MALLOC(sizeof(int) * test_pages);
>
> I'm not even sure why there is + 1 in the original code, what is that
> extra byte usefull for.
>
> Does the reproducer still work once we allocate these arrays correctly?
Yes, it works well with the correct allocation,
and it looks like there is no need to add the "+ 1", thanks.
>
>> + for (i = 0; i < test_pages; i++)
>> + pages[i] = addr + i * pgsz;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; ; i++) {
>> + for (j = 0; j < test_pages; j++) {
>> + if (i % 2 == 0)
>> + nodes[j] = node1;
>> + else
>> + nodes[j] = node2;
>> + status[j] = 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + TEST(numa_move_pages(ppid, test_pages,
>> + pages, nodes, status, MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL));
>> + if (TEST_RETURN) {
>> + tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "move_pages failed");
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + exit(0);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void do_test(void)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> + pid_t cpid = -1;
>> + int status;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < LOOPS; i++) {
>> + addr = SAFE_MMAP(NULL, TEST_PAGES * hpsz,
>> + PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
>> + MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_HUGETLB, -1, 0);
>> +
>> + memset(addr, 0, TEST_PAGES * hpsz);
>> +
>> + SAFE_MUNMAP(addr, TEST_PAGES * hpsz);
>> +
>> + if (i == 0) {
>> + cpid = SAFE_FORK();
>> + if (cpid == 0)
>> + do_child();
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (i == LOOPS) {
>> + SAFE_KILL(cpid, SIGKILL);
>> + SAFE_WAITPID(cpid, &status, 0);
>> + if (!WIFEXITED(status))
>> + tst_res(TPASS, "Bug not reproduced");
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void setup(void)
>> +{
>> + int memfree, ret;
>> +
>> + check_config(TEST_NODES);
>> +
>> + if (access(PATH_HUGEPAGES, F_OK))
>> + tst_brk(TCONF, "Huge page not supported");
>> +
>> + pgsz = (int)get_page_size();
>> + SAFE_FILE_LINES_SCANF(PATH_MEMINFO, "Hugepagesize: %d", &hpsz);
>> + hpsz *= 1024;
>> +
>> + SAFE_FILE_LINES_SCANF(PATH_MEMINFO, "MemFree: %d", &memfree);
>> + memfree *= 1024;
>> + if (4 * hpsz > memfree)
>> + tst_brk(TBROK, "RAM not enough");
> ^
> This should rather be "Not enough free RAM"
>
> Or something similar, but that is minor.
>
I will modify here as your description, thanks.
Best Regards,
Guangwen Feng
>> + SAFE_FILE_SCANF(PATH_NR_HUGEPAGES, "%ld", &orig_hugepages);
>> + SAFE_FILE_PRINTF(PATH_NR_HUGEPAGES, "%ld", orig_hugepages + 4);
>> +
>> + ret = get_allowed_nodes(NH_MEMS, TEST_NODES, &node1, &node2);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "get_allowed_nodes: %d", ret);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void cleanup(void)
>> +{
>> + SAFE_FILE_PRINTF(PATH_NR_HUGEPAGES, "%ld", orig_hugepages);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct tst_test test = {
>> + .tid = "move_pages12",
>> + .min_kver = "2.6.32",
>> + .needs_root = 1,
>> + .forks_child = 1,
>> + .setup = setup,
>> + .cleanup = cleanup,
>> + .test_all = do_test,
>> +};
>> +
>> +#else
>> + tst_res(TCONF, "move_pages support not found");
>> +#endif
>
> The rest looks good.
>
More information about the ltp
mailing list