[LTP] [PATCH V2 03/14] mem/oom: fix the timeout issue
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
Fri Jul 7 17:11:37 CEST 2017
Hi!
> OOM spend time is depend on amount of RAM+Swap, it's hard to get a standard
> to measure how long it takes, so that we cann't set tst_test->timeout easily.
>
> In this patch, we divide the tests into two part:
>
> 1. OOM takes original way on small(mem_total <= 100G) RAM, and with setting
> the .timeout according to the worst spending on 100G system. Here gives
> double(.timeout = 1200) cost in order to make sure time is long enough.
>
> 2. If system RAM is larger than 100G, OOM goes to the cgroup limited way.
I wonder if it's really OK to limit these tests to 100G of RAM. Since as
it is these tests can really stress the system on low memory conditions,
if we limit them to run inside of a cgroup we are testing cgroup
implementation instead, which is we should probably do as well.
I'm starting to think that OOM tests are special enough so that we can
add functionality to disable timeouts for these, i.e. set the .timeout
to -1 and change the test library so that the alarm() is not set in such
case.
Jan do you have anything to add?
> Signed-off-by: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
> ---
> testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom01.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom02.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom03.c | 1 +
> testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom04.c | 11 +++++++++++
> testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom05.c | 1 +
> 5 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom01.c b/testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom01.c
> index 64a368e..056e02a 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom01.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom01.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include "mem.h"
>
> +static unsigned long mem_total;
> +
> static void verify_oom(void)
> {
> #if __WORDSIZE == 32
> @@ -50,11 +52,20 @@ static void verify_oom(void)
>
> static void setup(void)
> {
> + mem_total = SAFE_READ_MEMINFO("MemTotal:");
> + if (mem_total > TESTMEM/1024*100L) {
> + tst_res(TINFO, "System RAM is larger than 100G, test in memory cgroup");
> + mount_mem("memcg", "cgroup", "memory", MEMCG_PATH, MEMCG_PATH_NEW);
> + write_memcg();
> + }
> +
> overcommit = get_sys_tune("overcommit_memory");
> }
>
> static void cleanup(void)
> {
> + if (mem_total > TESTMEM/1024*100L)
> + umount_mem(MEMCG_PATH, MEMCG_PATH_NEW);
> set_sys_tune("overcommit_memory", overcommit, 0);
> }
>
> @@ -62,6 +73,7 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
> .tid = "oom01",
> .needs_root = 1,
> .forks_child = 1,
> + .timeout = 1200,
> .setup = setup,
> .cleanup = cleanup,
> .test_all = verify_oom,
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom02.c b/testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom02.c
> index f315ee2..a1be806 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom02.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom02.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@
> #if HAVE_NUMA_H && HAVE_LINUX_MEMPOLICY_H && HAVE_NUMAIF_H \
> && HAVE_MPOL_CONSTANTS
>
> +static unsigned long mem_total;
> +
> static void verify_oom(void)
> {
> #if __WORDSIZE == 32
> @@ -50,6 +52,13 @@ static void verify_oom(void)
>
> static void setup(void)
> {
> + mem_total = SAFE_READ_MEMINFO("MemTotal:");
> + if (mem_total > TESTMEM/1024*100L) {
> + tst_res(TINFO, "System RAM is larger than 100G, test in memory cgroup");
> + mount_mem("memcg", "cgroup", "memory", MEMCG_PATH, MEMCG_PATH_NEW);
> + write_memcg();
> + }
> +
> if (!is_numa(NULL, NH_MEMS, 2))
> tst_brk(TCONF, "The case need a NUMA system.");
>
> @@ -59,6 +68,8 @@ static void setup(void)
>
> static void cleanup(void)
> {
> + if (mem_total > TESTMEM/1024*100L)
> + umount_mem(MEMCG_PATH, MEMCG_PATH_NEW);
> set_sys_tune("overcommit_memory", overcommit, 0);
> }
>
> @@ -66,6 +77,7 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
> .tid = "oom02",
> .needs_root = 1,
> .forks_child = 1,
> + .timeout = 1200,
> .setup = setup,
> .cleanup = cleanup,
> .test_all = verify_oom,
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom03.c b/testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom03.c
> index d3aed60..48c1ea5 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom03.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom03.c
> @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
> .tid = "oom03",
> .needs_root = 1,
> .forks_child = 1,
> + .timeout = 1200,
> .setup = setup,
> .cleanup = cleanup,
> .test_all = verify_oom,
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom04.c b/testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom04.c
> index afe35b2..179a98a 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom04.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom04.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@
> #if HAVE_NUMA_H && HAVE_LINUX_MEMPOLICY_H && HAVE_NUMAIF_H \
> && HAVE_MPOL_CONSTANTS
>
> +static unsigned long mem_total;
> +
> static void verify_oom(void)
> {
> #if __WORDSIZE == 32
> @@ -63,6 +65,12 @@ static void setup(void)
> overcommit = get_sys_tune("overcommit_memory");
> set_sys_tune("overcommit_memory", 1, 1);
>
> + mem_total = SAFE_READ_MEMINFO("MemTotal:");
> + if (mem_total > TESTMEM/1024*100L) {
> + tst_res(TINFO, "System RAM is larger than 100G, test in memory cgroup");
> + mount_mem("memcg", "cgroup", "memory", MEMCG_PATH, MEMCG_PATH_NEW);
> + write_memcg();
> + }
> mount_mem("cpuset", "cpuset", NULL, CPATH, CPATH_NEW);
>
> /*
> @@ -80,6 +88,8 @@ static void setup(void)
>
> static void cleanup(void)
> {
> + if (mem_total > TESTMEM/1024*100L)
> + umount_mem(MEMCG_PATH, MEMCG_PATH_NEW);
> set_sys_tune("overcommit_memory", overcommit, 0);
> umount_mem(CPATH, CPATH_NEW);
> }
> @@ -88,6 +98,7 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
> .tid = "oom04",
> .needs_root = 1,
> .forks_child = 1,
> + .timeout = 1200,
> .setup = setup,
> .cleanup = cleanup,
> .test_all = verify_oom,
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom05.c b/testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom05.c
> index d97fe7d..39361a9 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom05.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom05.c
> @@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
> .tid = "oom05",
> .needs_root = 1,
> .forks_child = 1,
> + .timeout = 1200,
> .setup = setup,
> .cleanup = cleanup,
> .test_all = verify_oom,
> --
> 2.9.3
>
>
> --
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
More information about the ltp
mailing list