[LTP] [PATCH] fs_fill: switch the SAFE MACROs back to ordinary syscall
Jan Stancek
jstancek@redhat.com
Wed Nov 22 13:48:30 CET 2017
----- Original Message -----
> Hi!
> > > But I can always change that in a follow up patch...
> >
> > How about this following change:
> >
> > --- a/testcases/kernel/fs/fs_fill/fs_fill.c
> > +++ b/testcases/kernel/fs/fs_fill/fs_fill.c
> > @@ -41,21 +41,11 @@ struct worker {
> >
> > static void *worker(void *p)
> > {
> > - int ret;
> > struct worker *w = p;
> > DIR *d;
> > struct dirent *ent;
> > char file[PATH_MAX];
> >
> > - ret = mkdir(w->dir, 0700);
> > - if (ret == -1) {
> > - if (errno != ENOSPC)
> > - tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "mkdir()");
> > -
> > - tst_res(TINFO | TERRNO, "mkdir()");
> > - return NULL;
> > - }
> > -
> > while (run) {
> > tst_fill_fs(w->dir, 0);
> >
> > @@ -92,6 +82,10 @@ static void testrun(void)
> > for (i = 0; i < nthreads; i++) {
> > snprintf(workers[i].dir, sizeof(workers[i].dir),
> > MNTPOINT "/thread%i", i + 1);
> > + SAFE_MKDIR(workers[i].dir, 0700);
> > + }
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < nthreads; i++) {
> > SAFE_PTHREAD_CREATE(&threads[i], NULL, worker,
> > &workers[i]);
> > }
>
> This one looks cleaner to me.
But perhaps this should go to setup(), otherwise with "-i 2"
it hits TBROK on mkdir.
I tried adding RMDIR after join, but unlink doesn't seem to remove
everything:
safe_macros.c:184: BROK: fs_fill.c:108: rmdir(mntpoint/thread4) failed: ENOTEMPTY
Regards,
Jan
More information about the ltp
mailing list