[LTP] [PATCH v2 3/3] crypto/crypto_user01.c: new test for information leak bug

[Cyril Hrubis]

Hi!
> No it doesn't really make sense to run a test twice, but this has two associated
> CVE numbers, resulting in two runs when tests are run by CVE number.  Are you
> saying you'd prefer that it be listed under just the more recent CVE?  Or are
> you saying the runtest/cve file will be going away and replaced by something
> else anyway?

For now I would just put it under the newer CVE number.

For a future I would like to be able to export all the metadata from the
tests to the tesrunner, so the testrunner would know, among other
things, which tests are associated with CVEs. That, in turn, would
eliminate the need to maintain various different sets of runtest files.

But given that I just started to work on that I do not expect it to be
finished anytime soon.

Does that sounds reasonable to you?

Also no need to resent the patchset, I can remove the runtest entry when
applying the patch.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz