[LTP] [PATCH] openposix/strncpy1-1: Fix compiler errors/warnings
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
Fri Dec 14 09:33:13 CET 2018
Hi!
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> .../conformance/interfaces/strncpy/1-1.c | 10 +++++++---
> testcases/open_posix_testsuite/include/posixtest.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/strncpy/1-1.c b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/strncpy/1-1.c
> index 396bd60..7006b5f 100644
> --- a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/strncpy/1-1.c
> +++ b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/strncpy/1-1.c
> @@ -61,10 +61,14 @@ int main(void)
> sample_str_1 = random_string(i);
> num_bytes = rand() % i;
>
> - #pragma GCC diagnostic push
> - #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wstringop-truncation"
> + #if GCC_VERSION >= 80100
> + # pragma GCC diagnostic push
> + # pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wstringop-truncation"
> + #endif
> ret_str = strncpy(sample_str_2, sample_str_1, num_bytes);
> - #pragma GCC diagnostic pop
> + #if GCC_VERSION >= 80100
> + # pragma GCC diagnostic pop
> + #endif
That looks even more silly than the original. I do not think that it's
reasonable to mess up the code that bad only to surpress a single
warning.
So what abour removing the pragmas entirely?
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
More information about the ltp
mailing list