[LTP] [PATCH v2] syscalls/madvise09.c: Use custom mount point instead of /sys/fs/cgroup/memory
Jan Stancek
jstancek@redhat.com
Mon Jan 15 09:06:02 CET 2018
----- Original Message -----
> Hi Jan,
>
> Could you help me review this patch.
Hi,
I think it would be better to use existing mount, if it's already mounted.
umount may fail with -EBUSY if the subsystem is already part of existing
hierarchy.
Regards,
Jan
>
> Thanks,
> Xiao Yang
> On 2018/01/04 10:43, xiao yang wrote:
> > 1) on some distros(e.g. RHEL6), memory cgroup was supported and
> > mounted on /cgroup/memory by default, but the test was skipped
> > if /sys/fs/cgroup/memory did not exist.
> >
> > 2) We got the following error if memory cgroup wasn't mounted
> > on /sys/fs/cgroup/memory:
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > safe_macros.c:169: BROK: madvise09.c:175:
> > mkdir(/sys/fs/cgroup/memory/ltp_madvise09_16386/,0777) failed: EROFS
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > We use custom mount point and mount memory cgroup on it manually
> > to fix these issues.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: xiao yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
> > ---
> > testcases/kernel/syscalls/madvise/madvise09.c | 26
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/madvise/madvise09.c
> > b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/madvise/madvise09.c
> > index f744405..25cf81f 100644
> > --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/madvise/madvise09.c
> > +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/madvise/madvise09.c
> > @@ -53,12 +53,14 @@
> > #include <errno.h>
> > #include <stdio.h>
> > #include <ctype.h>
> > +#include <sys/mount.h>
> >
> > #include "tst_test.h"
> > #include "lapi/mmap.h"
> >
> > -#define MEMCG_PATH "/sys/fs/cgroup/memory/"
> > +#define MEMCG_PATH "/dev/memcg_madvise09/"
> >
> > +static int memcg_mounted;
> > static char cgroup_path[PATH_MAX];
> > static char tasks_path[PATH_MAX];
> > static char limit_in_bytes_path[PATH_MAX];
> > @@ -277,6 +279,15 @@ static void cleanup(void)
> > {
> > if (cgroup_path[0] && !access(cgroup_path, F_OK))
> > rmdir(cgroup_path);
> > +
> > + if (memcg_mounted) {
> > + tst_res(TINFO, "Umount memory cgroup after testing");
> > + SAFE_UMOUNT(MEMCG_PATH);
> > + memcg_mounted = 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!access(MEMCG_PATH, F_OK) && rmdir(MEMCG_PATH))
> > + tst_res(TWARN | TERRNO, "Rmdir %s failed", MEMCG_PATH);
> > }
> >
> > static void run(void)
> > @@ -316,10 +327,17 @@ static void setup(void)
> > {
> > long int swap_total;
> >
> > - if (access(MEMCG_PATH, F_OK)) {
> > - tst_brk(TCONF, "'" MEMCG_PATH
> > - "' not present, CONFIG_MEMCG missing?");
> > + SAFE_MKDIR(MEMCG_PATH, 0777);
> > +
> > + tst_res(TINFO, "Mount memory cgroup on %s", MEMCG_PATH);
> > + if (mount("memcg", MEMCG_PATH, "cgroup", 0, "memory") == -1) {
> > + if (errno == ENODEV) {
> > + tst_brk(TCONF,
> > + "Memory cgroup was not configured in kernel");
> > + }
> > + tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "Failed to mount memory cgroup");
> > }
> > + memcg_mounted = 1;
> >
> > if (!access(MEMCG_PATH "memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes", F_OK))
> > swap_accounting_enabled = 1;
>
>
>
>
More information about the ltp
mailing list