[LTP] [PATCH] swapon: commit swapfile caches to disk
Li Wang
liwang@redhat.com
Tue Jun 12 15:05:22 CEST 2018
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 8:48 PM, Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz> wrote:
> Hi!
> > Testcase include swapon(8) fails on mainline kernel-v4.17+ as:
> > swapon01 1 TFAIL : swapon01.c:47: Failed to turn on swapfile:
> TEST_ERRNO=EINVAL(22): Invalid argument
> > swapon02 4 TFAIL : swapon02.c:91: swapon(2) failed to produce
> expected error: 16, errno: EBUSY and got 22.
> > swapon03 1 TFAIL : swapon03.c:243: Failed to setup swaps
> > swapoff01 1 TBROK : swapoff01.c:64: Failed to turn on the swap
> file, skipping test iteration
>
> 4.17+ means that this is yet to be release kernel, right? In that
> situation we wait if the change will survive upon the official release
> before changing the LTP test.
>
You are right, I'm OK to wait.
>
> > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/swapoff/swapoff01.c
> b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/swapoff/swapoff01.c
> > index a63e661..b587b0d 100644
> > --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/swapoff/swapoff01.c
> > +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/swapoff/swapoff01.c
> > @@ -105,6 +105,8 @@ static void setup(void)
> >
> > if (system("mkswap swapfile01 > tmpfile 2>&1") != 0)
> > tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "Failed to make swapfile");
> > +
> > + sync();
>
> Can we rather use fsync() and/or fdatasync()? I would like the avoid the
> system wide sync() here since that may slow down the test unnecessarily.
>
>
Actually I tried to add fsync() and syncfs() in tst_fill_file.c first, but
it does NOT works for me. After tracking more, I found that we have to
sync up caches in front of the command `mkswap swapfile`.
> --
> Cyril Hrubis
> chrubis@suse.cz
>
--
Regards,
Li Wang
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/attachments/20180612/4c553103/attachment.html>
More information about the ltp
mailing list