[LTP] [PATCH 2/3] lib: Introduce TESTPTR()
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
Wed Jun 20 12:08:11 CEST 2018
Hi!
> +extern void *TEST_RETURN_PTR;
> +
> +#define TESTPTR(SCALL) \
> + do { \
> + errno = 0; \
> + TEST_RETURN_PTR = (void*)(TEST_RETURN = (intptr_t)SCALL); \
I guess that this expression is safe enough, since TEST_RETURN is long,
so the assigment will not overflow, but that also begs a question why do
we assign it in the first place?
> + TEST_ERRNO = errno; \
> + } while (0)
> +
> /*
> * Functions to convert ERRNO to its name and SIGNAL to its name.
> */
> diff --git a/lib/tst_res.c b/lib/tst_res.c
> index 8ff7ee425..84becbef4 100644
> --- a/lib/tst_res.c
> +++ b/lib/tst_res.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@
>
> long TEST_RETURN;
> int TEST_ERRNO;
> +void *TEST_RETURN_PTR;
Can we please name it a bit better so that we avoid renaming it later
on? What about TST_RET_PTR so that it's consistent with the planned
rename of TEST_RETURN to just TST_RET?
> #define VERBOSE 1
> #define NOPASS 3
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
More information about the ltp
mailing list