[LTP] [PATCH] open_posix_testsuite/mmap24-2: Support mips
Hongzhi, Song
hongzhi.song@windriver.com
Mon Nov 5 02:15:41 CET 2018
Kindly ping
--Hongzhi
On 11/01/2018 09:49 AM, Hongzhi, Song wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Referring to POSIX spec, the return values, EINVAL and ENOMEM,
>
> are all right if MAP_FIXED is set. So I think Mips also keep to POSIX.
>
>
> Please review this patch.
>
>
> --Hongzhi
>
>
> On 10/24/2018 10:36 AM, Hongzhi.Song wrote:
>> Mips will return EINVAL instead of ENOMEM as expected
>> if MAP_FIXED is set and the range of [addr + len) exceeds
>> TASK_SIZE.
>>
>> Linux kernel code: arch/mips/mm/mmap.c
>> if (flags & MAP_FIXED) {
>> /* Even MAP_FIXED mappings must reside within TASK_SIZE */
>> if (TASK_SIZE - len < addr)
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> The POSIX specification says:
>> "If MAP_FIXED is set, mmap() may return MAP_FAILED and set errno to
>> [EINVAL]."
>> [http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/mmap.html]
>>
>> So I think the mips kernel remains POSIX compliant.
>>
>> Relax the condition and accept both ENOMEM and EINVAL
>> as expected outcome.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hongzhi.Song <hongzhi.song@windriver.com>
>> ---
>> .../open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/mmap/24-2.c | 10
>> +++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git
>> a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/mmap/24-2.c
>> b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/mmap/24-2.c
>> index de51d43..810e5c8 100644
>> --- a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/mmap/24-2.c
>> +++ b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/mmap/24-2.c
>> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
>> * source tree.
>> *
>> * The mmap() function shall fail if:
>> - * [ENOMEM] MAP_FIXED was specified,
>> + * [ENOMEM or EINVAL] MAP_FIXED was specified,
>> * and the range [addr,addr+len) exceeds that allowed
>> * for the address space of a process; or, if MAP_FIXED was not
>> specified and
>> * there is insufficient room in the address space to effect the
>> mapping.
>> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
>> * Test Step:
>> * 1. Map a shared memory object, with size exceeding the value get
>> from
>> * rlim_cur of resource RLIMIT_AS, setting MAP_FIXED;
>> - * 3. Should get ENOMEM.
>> + * 3. Should get ENOMEM or EINVAL.
>> */
>> #define _XOPEN_SOURCE 600
>> @@ -93,8 +93,8 @@ int main(void)
>> (unsigned long)len);
>> pa = mmap(addr, len, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_FIXED |
>> MAP_SHARED, fd,
>> 0);
>> - if (pa == MAP_FAILED && errno == ENOMEM) {
>> - printf("Got ENOMEM: %s\nTest PASSED\n", strerror(errno));
>> + if (pa == MAP_FAILED && (errno == ENOMEM || errno == EINVAL)) {
>> + printf("Got ENOMEM or EINVAL: %s\nTest PASSED\n",
>> strerror(errno));
>> exit(PTS_PASS);
>> }
>> @@ -103,6 +103,6 @@ int main(void)
>> else
>> munmap(pa, len);
>> close(fd);
>> - printf("Test Fail: Did not get ENOMEM as expected\n");
>> + printf("Test Failed: Did not get ENOMEM or EINVAL as expected\n");
>> return PTS_FAIL;
>> }
>
>
More information about the ltp
mailing list