[LTP] [RFC PATCH 0/2] Cleanup runtests containing duplicate definitions

Jan Stancek jstancek@redhat.com
Mon Nov 5 16:05:02 CET 2018


----- Original Message -----
> Jan, did we internal ltp-lite take reference from the ltplite file?

Probably only at the beginning, when original author of beaker test
forked ltplite runtest file. I've been using syscalls/other runtest
files, since those are more up to date.

> I wanna
> know how do we customize our internal ltp-lite testcases.

syscalls + cherry-picked tests from other runtest files.
We might be getting off-topic w.r.t this mailing list.

Regards,
Jan

> 
> -- Sending by my PH1 phone.
> 
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2018, 19:43 Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > > anyone using these? Objections?
> > > IMHO there is no point trying to keep them sync.
> > It looks like no objection to this, so I'll remove it.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Petr
> >
> 


More information about the ltp mailing list