[LTP] [RFC PATCH 0/2] Cleanup runtests containing duplicate definitions
Jan Stancek
jstancek@redhat.com
Mon Nov 5 16:05:02 CET 2018
----- Original Message -----
> Jan, did we internal ltp-lite take reference from the ltplite file?
Probably only at the beginning, when original author of beaker test
forked ltplite runtest file. I've been using syscalls/other runtest
files, since those are more up to date.
> I wanna
> know how do we customize our internal ltp-lite testcases.
syscalls + cherry-picked tests from other runtest files.
We might be getting off-topic w.r.t this mailing list.
Regards,
Jan
>
> -- Sending by my PH1 phone.
>
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2018, 19:43 Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > > anyone using these? Objections?
> > > IMHO there is no point trying to keep them sync.
> > It looks like no objection to this, so I'll remove it.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Petr
> >
>
More information about the ltp
mailing list