[LTP] [RFC PATCH 0/2] Cleanup runtests containing duplicate definitions
Li Wang
liwang@redhat.com
Tue Nov 6 10:25:22 CET 2018
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 3:01 AM, Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> wrote:
> Hi Jan, Li,
>
> > > Jan, did we internal ltp-lite take reference from the ltplite file?
>
> > Probably only at the beginning, when original author of beaker test
> > forked ltplite runtest file. I've been using syscalls/other runtest
> > files, since those are more up to date.
>
> > > I wanna
> > > know how do we customize our internal ltp-lite testcases.
>
> > syscalls + cherry-picked tests from other runtest files.
>
> Is it problematic for you to remove these runtest files?
>
I think we're OK to remove that in upstream.
> Hope not, but if yes, please let me know. I'll wait for your ack before
> removing it.
>
> Kind regards,
> Petr
>
--
Regards,
Li Wang
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/attachments/20181106/db4c71ad/attachment.html>
More information about the ltp
mailing list