[LTP] [PATCH v2] Test statx syscall for SYNC_FLAGS
Petr Vorel
pvorel@suse.cz
Tue Nov 27 12:59:06 CET 2018
Hi Kewal,
LGTM, bellow are some minor enhancement tips.
> * statx06.c :-
This could be deleted.
Maybe first line of commit message "syscalls/statx: Add test for sync flags"
(SYNC_FLAGS looks like a constant, which is misleading).
> Testcase 1: AT_STATX_DONT_SYNC
> With AT_STATX_DONT_SYNC server changes should not get sync with client.
> Testcase 2: AT_STATX_FORCE_SYNC
> With AT_STATX_FORCE_SYNC server changes should get sync with client.
> Signed-off-by: Kewal Ukunde <kewal@zilogic.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vaishnavi.d <vaishnavi.d@zilogic.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tarun.T.U <tarun@zilogic.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
> ---
> runtest/syscalls | 1 +
> testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/.gitignore | 1 +
> testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/statx06.c | 195 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 197 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/statx06.c
It's needed to rename statx06.c to statx07.c (as previous was taken).
...
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/statx06.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/statx06.c
...
> +static void test_for_dont_sync(void)
> +{
> + unsigned int cur_mode;
> + char server_path[F_PATH_SIZE];
> +
> + snprintf(server_path, sizeof(server_path), "%s/%s", SERVER_PATH,
> + DONT_SYNC_FILE);
> +
> + get_mode(DONT_SYNC_FILE, AT_STATX_FORCE_SYNC,
> + "AT_STATX_FORCE_SYNC");
> +
> + SAFE_CHMOD(server_path, CURRENT_MODE);
> + cur_mode = get_mode(DONT_SYNC_FILE, AT_STATX_DONT_SYNC,
> + "AT_STATX_DONT_SYNC");
> +
> + if (MODE(cur_mode) == DEFAULT_MODE)
> + tst_res(TPASS,
> + "statx() with AT_STATX_DONT_SYNC for mode %o %o",
> + DEFAULT_MODE, MODE(cur_mode));
> + else
> + tst_res(TFAIL,
> + "statx() with AT_STATX_DONT_SYNC for mode %o %o",
> + DEFAULT_MODE, MODE(cur_mode));
> +}
> +
> +static void test_for_force_sync(void)
> +{
> + unsigned int cur_mode;
> + char server_path[F_PATH_SIZE];
> +
> + snprintf(server_path, sizeof(server_path), "%s/%s", SERVER_PATH,
> + FORCE_SYNC_FILE);
> +
> + SAFE_CHMOD(server_path, CURRENT_MODE);
> + cur_mode = get_mode(FORCE_SYNC_FILE, AT_STATX_FORCE_SYNC,
> + "AT_STATX_FORCE_SYNC");
> +
> + if (MODE(cur_mode) == CURRENT_MODE)
> + tst_res(TPASS,
> + "statx() with AT_STATX_FORCE_SYNC for mode %o %o",
> + CURRENT_MODE, MODE(cur_mode));
> + else
> + tst_res(TFAIL,
> + "statx() with AT_STATX_FORCE_SYNC for mode %o %o",
> + CURRENT_MODE, MODE(cur_mode));
> +}
> +
> +const struct test_cases {
> + void (*func)(void);
> +} tcases[] = {
> + {test_for_dont_sync},
> + {test_for_force_sync}
> +};
Both testing functions are nearly the same, why to repeat yourself?
How about, instead of passing test function pointer, pass mode and other needed
parameters to single test function?
> +
> +static void test_statx(unsigned int nr)
> +{
> + const struct test_cases *tc = &tcases[nr];
> +
> + tc->func();
> +}
I suggest other changes (see following diff):
* Add mount flag to avoid false positive warning:
safe_macros.c:773: WARN: statx07.c:181: umount(client) failed: EINVAL
* Fix gcc-8 format-truncation error (1024 is far too much, it could be less).
* Use tst_res(TWARN, ...) for exportfs.
Kind regards,
Petr
diff --git testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/statx07.c testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/statx07.c
index f64322d7d..ff988fd00 100644
--- testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/statx07.c
+++ testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/statx07.c
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
static char cwd[PATH_MAX];
static char cmd[BUFF_SIZE];
+static int mounted;
static int get_mode(char *file_name, int flag_type, char *flag_name)
{
@@ -163,7 +162,7 @@ static void setup(void)
snprintf(mount_data, sizeof(mount_data), "addr=%s", ip);
snprintf(cmd, sizeof(cmd),
- "exportfs -i -o no_root_squash,rw,sync,no_subtree_check *%s",
+ "exportfs -i -o no_root_squash,rw,sync,no_subtree_check *%.1024s",
server_path);
ret = tst_system(cmd);
@@ -173,14 +172,16 @@ static void setup(void)
tst_brk(TBROK | TST_ERR, "failed to exportfs");
SAFE_MOUNT(server_path, client_path, "nfs", 0, mount_data);
+ mounted = 1;
}
static void cleanup(void)
{
if (tst_system("exportfs -ua") == -1)
- tst_brk(TBROK | TST_ERR, "failed to clear exportfs");
+ tst_res(TWARN | TST_ERR, "failed to clear exportfs");
- SAFE_UMOUNT(CLIENT_PATH);
+ if (mounted)
+ SAFE_UMOUNT(CLIENT_PATH);
}
static struct tst_test test = {
More information about the ltp
mailing list