[LTP] [RFC PATCH 5/5] runtest/numa: remove move_pages* test cases

[Stanislav Kholmanskikh]

On 10/02/2018 04:09 PM, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
>> since they are already defined in runtest/syscalls.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kholmanskikh <stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com>
>> ---
>>  runtest/numa | 12 ------------
>>  1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/runtest/numa b/runtest/numa
>> index 12aedbb..510c353 100644
>> --- a/runtest/numa
>> +++ b/runtest/numa
>> @@ -1,13 +1 @@
>>  Numa-testcases numa01.sh
>> -move_pages01 move_pages01
>> -move_pages02 move_pages02
>> -move_pages03 move_pages03
>> -move_pages04 move_pages04
>> -move_pages05 move_pages05
>> -move_pages06 move_pages06
>> -move_pages07 move_pages07
>> -move_pages08 move_pages08
>> -move_pages09 move_pages09
>> -move_pages10 move_pages10
>> -move_pages11 move_pages11
>> -move_pages12 move_pages12
> 
> Or we may remove the numa runtest file from the default scenario, given
> that the move_pages tests are in syscalls and the numa01.sh is known to
> be broken there is a little value in keeping it in default scenario.
> 
> And once I finish the numa01.sh rewrite, we will get set_mempolicy
> syscall tests in syscalls runtest file anyways, so we may keep the numa
> to be a separate runtest file for a case that someone wants to run only
> numa related tests.
> 

Alright, I will remove the numa runtest file from the default scenario
in the next series.

Thank you.