[LTP] [PATCH v2] setregid03: convert to newlib

[Clemens Famulla-Conrad]

Hi,

On 10/16/18 5:40 PM, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
>> Do not fork, cause I don't see the need for it. Maybe a left over
>> from previous changes.
> 
> And I figured out why it was there. If we do not fork the possitive
> testcases fail on the second and subsequent iterations, try to run the
> test with -i 2.

Nice catch, thx.

> Also it may be a bit cleaner to just split the test into two one with
> possitive and one with negative tests, which will simplify the code and
> we can then fork only for the test that tests for the positive cases.

Ok I will go with this advice.

Clemens