[LTP] [RFC 1/3] syscalls/fanotify03: defined additional tcase members to support more tcase control
Amir Goldstein
amir73il@gmail.com
Wed Oct 24 07:23:47 CEST 2018
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 6:27 AM Matthew Bobrowski
<mbobrowski@mbobrowski.org> wrote:
>
> * Included the event mask member to be used for fanotify_mark() within
> the tcase. This allows control over what event types are to be
> generated on a tcase by tcase level as oppose to having it globally
> defined for all tcases.
>
> * Included the event_set and event_resp arrays into a tcase so that
> the sequence of expected events can be defined on a test case by test
> case level. Both event_set and event_resp are now represented by the
> event struct.
>
> * Added event_count member to tcase in order to represent the number of
> expected events for each tcase.
>
> * Fanotify permission events cannot be merged, thus cleaned up some
> unnecessary code in test_fanotify() that checks whether any additional
> bits are left within event->mask.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Bobrowski <mbobrowski@mbobrowski.org>
> ---
Looks good! nits below.
> .../kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify03.c | 90 ++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify03.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify03.c
> index 5c105ed32..cca15aa00 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify03.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify03.c
> @@ -42,28 +42,48 @@ static volatile int fd_notify;
>
> static pid_t child_pid;
>
> -static unsigned long long event_set[EVENT_MAX];
> -static unsigned int event_resp[EVENT_MAX];
> -
> static char event_buf[EVENT_BUF_LEN];
> static int support_perm_events;
>
> +struct event {
> + unsigned long long type;
It's better to name this also 'mask' as in the near future you will
want to assign it the value of OPEN_PERM|OPEN_EXEC_PERM
which is not a 'type'.
> + unsigned int response;
> +};
> +
> static struct tcase {
> const char *tname;
> struct fanotify_mark_type mark;
> + unsigned long long mask;
> + int event_count;
> + struct event event_set[EVENT_MAX];
Better change the value of EVENT_MAX...
or even decouple it from EVENT_BUF_LEN
> } tcases[] = {
> {
> "inode mark permission events",
> INIT_FANOTIFY_MARK_TYPE(INODE),
> + FAN_OPEN_PERM | FAN_ACCESS_PERM, 2,
> + {
> + {FAN_OPEN_PERM, FAN_ALLOW},
> + {FAN_ACCESS_PERM, FAN_DENY}
> + }
> },
> {
> "mount mark permission events",
> INIT_FANOTIFY_MARK_TYPE(MOUNT),
> + FAN_OPEN_PERM | FAN_ACCESS_PERM, 2,
> + {
> + {FAN_OPEN_PERM, FAN_ALLOW},
> + {FAN_ACCESS_PERM, FAN_DENY}
> + }
> },
> {
> "filesystem mark permission events",
> INIT_FANOTIFY_MARK_TYPE(FILESYSTEM),
> - },
> + FAN_OPEN_PERM | FAN_ACCESS_PERM, 2,
> + {
> + {FAN_OPEN_PERM, FAN_ALLOW},
> + {FAN_ACCESS_PERM, FAN_DENY}
> + }
> + }
> };
>
> static void generate_events(void)
> @@ -146,8 +166,7 @@ static int setup_mark(unsigned int n)
>
> fd_notify = SAFE_FANOTIFY_INIT(FAN_CLASS_CONTENT, O_RDONLY);
>
> - if (fanotify_mark(fd_notify, FAN_MARK_ADD | mark->flag,
> - FAN_ACCESS_PERM | FAN_OPEN_PERM,
> + if (fanotify_mark(fd_notify, FAN_MARK_ADD | mark->flag, tc->mask,
> AT_FDCWD, fname) < 0) {
> if (errno == EINVAL && support_perm_events &&
> mark->flag == FAN_MARK_FILESYSTEM) {
> @@ -167,7 +186,7 @@ static int setup_mark(unsigned int n)
> }
> } else {
> /*
> - * To distigouish between perm event not supported and
> + * To distinguish between perm event not supported and
> * filesystem mark not supported.
> */
> support_perm_events = 1;
> @@ -179,32 +198,22 @@ static int setup_mark(unsigned int n)
>
> static void test_fanotify(unsigned int n)
> {
> - int tst_count;
> int ret, len = 0, i = 0, test_num = 0;
> + struct tcase *tc = &tcases[n];
> + struct event *event_set = tc->event_set;
>
> if (setup_mark(n) != 0)
> return;
>
> run_child();
>
> - tst_count = 0;
> -
> - event_set[tst_count] = FAN_OPEN_PERM;
> - event_resp[tst_count++] = FAN_ALLOW;
> - event_set[tst_count] = FAN_ACCESS_PERM;
> - event_resp[tst_count++] = FAN_DENY;
> -
> - /* tst_count + 1 is for checking child return value */
> - if (TST_TOTAL != tst_count + 1) {
> - tst_brk(TBROK,
> - "TST_TOTAL and tst_count do not match");
> - }
> - tst_count = 0;
> -
> /*
> - * check events
> + * Process events
> + *
> + * tc->count + 1 is to accommodate for checking the child process
> + * return value
> */
> - while (test_num < TST_TOTAL && fd_notify != -1) {
> + while (test_num < tc->event_count + 1 && fd_notify != -1) {
> struct fanotify_event_metadata *event;
>
> if (i == len) {
> @@ -222,12 +231,12 @@ static void test_fanotify(unsigned int n)
> }
>
> event = (struct fanotify_event_metadata *)&event_buf[i];
> - if (!(event->mask & event_set[test_num])) {
> + if (!(event->mask & event_set[test_num].type)) {
/* Permission events cannot be merged, so... */
+ if (event->mask != event_set[test_num].mask) {
Thanks,
Amir.
More information about the ltp
mailing list