[LTP] [PATCH] lib/tst_device.c: Make sure all loop deivces fot test are detached
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
Wed Sep 12 14:33:32 CEST 2018
Hi!
> Running statx05 by runltp without -b option every time attached a loop
> device but didn't detach it, as below:
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ...
> tst_device.c:230: INFO: Using test device LTP_DEV='/dev/loop0'
> tst_device.c:268: INFO: Skipping $LTP_DEV size 256MB, requested size 512MB
> tst_device.c:83: INFO: Found free device '/dev/loop1'
> tst_mkfs.c:83: INFO: Formatting /dev/loop1 with ext4 opts='' extra opts='-O encrypt'
> ...
> NAME SIZELIMIT OFFSET AUTOCLEAR RO BACK-FILE DIO
> /dev/loop1 0 0 0 0 /tmp/ltp-gsrcFAkGpZ/Wka3bp/test_dev.img (deleted) 0
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> runltp created a block device with default 256M size by attaching a free loop
> device and set LTP_DEV variable, but statx05 needed a 512M block device, so
> tst_acquire_device__() in setup skipped the $LTP_DEV device and created another
> block device with 512M size by attaching another free loop device. Unfortunately,
> tst_release_device() in cleanup cannot detach the 512M block device due to the
> defined LTP_DEV.
Btw his has been fixed for statx since:
commit e583eacf3c9781116c19dec4c7e8c0aa4ed01ed5
Author: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
Date: Tue Sep 11 17:27:43 2018 +0200
syscalls/statx05: Fix test on ppc64le
But yes apart from that the test library is still broken.
> We should just skip the detach in tst_release_device() when LTP_DEV variable is
> set and device_acquired flag is not set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> lib/tst_device.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/tst_device.c b/lib/tst_device.c
> index 463743443..23c99dba2 100644
> --- a/lib/tst_device.c
> +++ b/lib/tst_device.c
> @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ int tst_release_device(const char *dev)
> {
> int ret;
>
> - if (getenv("LTP_DEV"))
> + if (getenv("LTP_DEV") && !device_acquired)
> return 0;
I guess that this really should be just:
if (!device_acquired)
return 0;
I will double check and test it later today.
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
More information about the ltp
mailing list