[LTP] [PATCH v3 1/2] capability: Introduce capability API

[Cyril Hrubis]

Hi!
> There is a warning, but I guess that's just gcc being paranoid:
> test_guarded_buf.c:93:1: warning: missing initializer for field ???caps??? of ???struct tst_test??? [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
>    93 | };
>       | ^
> In file included from test_guarded_buf.c:12:
> ../../include/tst_test.h:214:18: note: ???caps??? declared here
>   214 |  struct tst_cap *caps;
>       |                  ^~~~

That sounds like a gcc bug since for designated initializers omitted
fields are implicitly initialized to zero, there is no point in
producing warnings like this one. I guess that we trigger that by
inlining a structure that is inialized by mixing plain and designated
initalizers in the middle of the structure.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz