[LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/quotactl07: add regresstion test for Q_XQTUOTARM
Xiao Yang
ice_yangxiao@163.com
Wed Dec 4 15:57:28 CET 2019
Hi Yang,
On 12/4/19 6:57 PM, Yang Xu wrote:
> This is a regresstion test to check Q_XQUOTARM whether has
> quota flags check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> include/lapi/quotactl.h | 4 +
> runtest/syscalls | 1 +
> testcases/kernel/syscalls/quotactl/.gitignore | 1 +
> .../kernel/syscalls/quotactl/quotactl07.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 95 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/syscalls/quotactl/quotactl07.c
>
> diff --git a/include/lapi/quotactl.h b/include/lapi/quotactl.h
> index d3223b863..c1ec9d6e1 100644
> --- a/include/lapi/quotactl.h
> +++ b/include/lapi/quotactl.h
> @@ -59,6 +59,10 @@ struct fs_quota_statv {
> # define PRJQUOTA 2
> #endif
>
> +#ifndef Q_XQUOTARM
> +# define Q_XQUOTARM XQM_CMD(6)
> +#endif
> +
> #ifndef Q_XGETQSTATV
> # define Q_XGETQSTATV XQM_CMD(8)
> #endif
> diff --git a/runtest/syscalls b/runtest/syscalls
> index 15dbd9971..0f75cf3f6 100644
> --- a/runtest/syscalls
> +++ b/runtest/syscalls
> @@ -958,6 +958,7 @@ quotactl03 quotactl03
> quotactl04 quotactl04
> quotactl05 quotactl05
> quotactl06 quotactl06
> +quotactl07 quotactl07
>
> read01 read01
> read02 read02
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/quotactl/.gitignore b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/quotactl/.gitignore
> index 12896d6ad..8d2ef94d9 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/quotactl/.gitignore
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/quotactl/.gitignore
> @@ -4,3 +4,4 @@
> /quotactl04
> /quotactl05
> /quotactl06
> +/quotactl07
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/quotactl/quotactl07.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/quotactl/quotactl07.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..076db0bfe
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/quotactl/quotactl07.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2019 FUJITSU LIMITED. All rights reserved.
> + * Author: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
> + *
> + * This is a regresstion test for kernel commit 3dd4d40b4208
> + * ("xfs: Sanity check flags of Q_XQUOTARM call").
> + */
> +
> +#include "config.h"
> +#include <errno.h>
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <sys/quota.h>
> +#include "lapi/quotactl.h"
> +#include "tst_test.h"
> +
> +#ifdef HAVE_XFS_XQM_H
> +# include <xfs/xqm.h>
> +
> +#define MNTPOINT "mntpoint"
> +
> +static uint32_t qflag_acct = XFS_QUOTA_UDQ_ACCT;
> +static int test_id;
> +static int xquotarm_nsup;
> +static unsigned int valid_type = 1;
> +static unsigned int invalid_type = 9;
> +
> +static void verify_quota(void)
> +{
> + if (xquotarm_nsup) {
> + tst_res(TCONF,
> + "current system doesn't support Q_XQUOTARM, skip it");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + SAFE_MOUNT(tst_device->dev, MNTPOINT, tst_device->fs_type, 0, "quota");
> +
> + TEST(quotactl(QCMD(Q_XQUOTAOFF, USRQUOTA), tst_device->dev, test_id, (void *)&qflag_acct));
> + if (TST_RET == -1)
> + tst_brk(TBROK | TTERRNO, "quotactl with Q_XQUOTAOFF failed");
Is it possible to git rid of Q_XQUOTAOFF and call Q_XQUOTARM with
invalid_type directly?
> +
> + TEST(quotactl(QCMD(Q_XQUOTARM, USRQUOTA), tst_device->dev, test_id, (void *)&invalid_type));
> + if (TST_ERR == EINVAL)
> + tst_res(TPASS, "Q_XQUOTARM has quota type check");
> + else
> + tst_res(TFAIL, "Q_XQUOTARM doesn't have quota type check");
> +
> + SAFE_UMOUNT(MNTPOINT);
> +}
> +
> +static void setup(void)
> +{
> + test_id = geteuid();
Is test_id necessary? It seems to be ignored by both Q_XQUOTAOFF and
Q_XQUOTARM.
> +
> + SAFE_MOUNT(tst_device->dev, MNTPOINT, tst_device->fs_type, 0, "quota");
> +
> + TEST(quotactl(QCMD(Q_XQUOTAOFF, USRQUOTA), tst_device->dev, test_id, (void *)&qflag_acct));
> + if (TST_RET == -1)
> + tst_brk(TBROK | TTERRNO, "quotactl with Q_XQUOTAOFF failed");
> +
> + TEST(quotactl(QCMD(Q_XQUOTARM, USRQUOTA), tst_device->dev, test_id, (void *)&valid_type));
> + if (TST_ERR == EINVAL)
> + xquotarm_nsup = 1;
Is xquotarm_nsup variable duplicated? it seems simpler to report TCONF here.
> +
> + SAFE_UMOUNT(MNTPOINT);
Why do you need to mount and then umount?
Could we call Q_XQUOTAON if you have to turn on usrquota again?
Best Regards,
Xiao Yang
> +}
> +
> +static const char *kconfigs[] = {
> + "CONFIG_XFS_QUOTA",
> + NULL
> +};
> +
> +static struct tst_test test = {
> + .setup = setup,
> + .needs_root = 1,
> + .needs_kconfigs = kconfigs,
> + .test_all = verify_quota,
> + .format_device = 1,
> + .dev_fs_type = "xfs",
> + .mntpoint = MNTPOINT,
> + .tags = (const struct tst_tag[]) {
> + {"linux-git", "3dd4d40b4208"},
> + {}
> + }
> +};
> +#else
> + TST_TEST_TCONF("System doesn't have <xfs/xqm.h>");
> +#endif
More information about the ltp
mailing list