[LTP] [PATCH] cpuhotplug05.sh: Rewrite test case

[Petr Vorel]

Hi,

> On 12/9/19 4:13 AM, Xiao Yang wrote:
> >> Your new scenario has two problems:

> >> - You have to run at least two test loops to verify that reactivating a
> >> CPU doesn't break /proc/stat entries.

> > I think running cpuhotplug05.sh with -i 2 can verfiy this point.

> > Perhaps we can add -i option to runtest/cpuhotplug, or do you prefer to
> > keep the original scenario?

> I'd prefer keeping the original scenario (with your version of cleanup).
> Running extra iterations of the same test should not be required to get
> the full intended test coverage.
Agree with Martin. Yang, could you, please, send new version, where you keep it?


Kind regards,
Petr