[LTP] [PATCH] cpu_hotplug/cpuhotplug03.sh: Accurately select command name by -C option
Xiao Yang
yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com
Fri Jan 4 03:38:44 CET 2019
On 2019/01/04 5:03, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi Xiao,
>
> ...
>>>> References:
>>>> procps commit: bb272580a6f3c192c61e307f9e341514d892d06e
>>>> procps commit: 14005a371e5c14289e96a4927ffd1a827d3c9d85
>>>> procps commit: 2cfdbbe897f0d4e41460c7c2b92acfc5804652c8
>>>> kernel commit: 6b59808bfe482642287ddf3fe9d4cccb10756652
> Merged with minor changes: remove references from code and use standard
> references (short has + commit message) in commit message.
>
> Thanks for your patch!.
Hi Petr,
Thanks for your push.
>>>> Note:
>>>> I think the lastest ps(1) manpage for command name length is confused
>>>> because kernel only extend workqueue worker name to 64 characters by
>>>> commit 6b59808 and still truncate normal command name to 16 characters.
>>>> e.g:
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> cd /root/ltp/testcases/kernel/hotplug/cpu_hotplug/tools
>>>> PATH=$PATH:$PWD cpuhotplug_do_spin_loop&
>>>> [1] 8732
>>>> cat /proc/8732/stat
>>>> 8732 (cpuhotplug_do_s) ...
>>>> cat /proc/8732/status | grep Name
>>>> Name: cpuhotplug_do_s
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Agree.
>>>> I will try to update ps(1) manpage for command name length.
>>> Good :).
> Out of curiosity: have you reported it to procps upstream?
I have reported and sent a fix patch to procps mail list(i.e.
procps@freelists.org), but it
seems that nobody reveiws and pushes it. I am going to ping. :-)
Please see attachment for our fix patch.
Best Regards,
Xiao Yang
>
> Kind regards,
> Petr
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-docs-Correct-ps.1-for-command-name-length.patch
URL: <http://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/attachments/20190104/b5db03ce/attachment-0001.ksh>
More information about the ltp
mailing list