[LTP] [PATCH V2] getrlimit03: adjust a bit of code to compatiable with mips32
Hongzhi, Song
hongzhi.song@windriver.com
Fri Jul 12 07:46:24 CEST 2019
On 7/11/19 3:48 PM, Jan Stancek wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> Error info:
>> getrlimit03.c:104: FAIL: __NR_prlimit64(0) had rlim_cur =
>> ffffffffffffffff but __NR_getrlimit(0) had rlim_cur = 7fffffff
>>
>> According to kernel code: [arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/resource.h]
>> RLIM_INFINITY is set to 0x7fffffffUL instead of ULONG_MAX on mips32.
>>
>> /*
>> * SuS says limits have to be unsigned.
>> * Which makes a ton more sense anyway,
>> * but we keep the old value on MIPS32,
>> * for compatibility:
>> */
>> #ifndef __mips64
>> # define RLIM_INFINITY 0x7fffffffUL
>> #endif
>>
>> Adding conditional statement about mips to fix this.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hongzhi.Song <hongzhi.song@windriver.com>
>> ---
>> testcases/kernel/syscalls/getrlimit/getrlimit03.c | 10 ++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getrlimit/getrlimit03.c
>> b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getrlimit/getrlimit03.c
>> index e4d56c4..1903558 100644
>> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getrlimit/getrlimit03.c
>> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getrlimit/getrlimit03.c
>> @@ -61,7 +61,13 @@ struct rlimit_ulong {
>> unsigned long rlim_cur;
>> unsigned long rlim_max;
>> };
>> +#ifdef __mips
>> +#ifndef __mips64
>> +const unsigned long RLIM_INFINITY_UL = 0x7fffffffUL;
>> +#else
>> const unsigned long RLIM_INFINITY_UL = ULONG_MAX;
>> +#endif
>> +#endif
> Hi,
>
> This will break every other arch, because it's now undefined everywhere except mips.
Is there a good way to filter mips32?
I tried
65 #ifdef __mips
66 #ifndef __mips64
67 const unsigned long RLIM_INFINITY_UL = 0x7fffffffUL;
68 #endif
69 const unsigned long RLIM_INFINITY_UL = ULONG_MAX;
70 #else
71 const unsigned long RLIM_INFINITY_UL = ULONG_MAX;
72 #endif
but mips32 thinks the RLIM_INFINITY_UL micro is redefined.
>
>>
>> static int getrlimit_ulong(int resource, struct rlimit_ulong *rlim)
>> {
>> @@ -101,8 +107,8 @@ static int compare_u64_ulong(int resource, uint64_t
>> val_u64,
>> {
>> if ((val_u64 > RLIM_INFINITY_UL && val_ul != RLIM_INFINITY_UL) ||
>> (val_u64 <= RLIM_INFINITY_UL && val_ul != val_u64)) {
>> - tst_res(TFAIL, "__NR_prlimit64(%d) had %s = %" PRIx64 " but "
>> __NR_getrlimit_ulong_str "(%d) had %s = %lx",
>> - resource, kind, val_u64,
>> + tst_res(TFAIL, "SIGNED_GETRLIMIT = %d __WORDSIZE %d ULONG_MAX = %lu
>> RLIM_INFINITY_UL = %lu __NR_prlimit64(%d) had %s = %" PRIx64 " but "
>> __NR_getrlimit_ulong_str "(%d) had %s = %lx",
>> + SIGNED_GETRLIMIT, __WORDSIZE, ULONG_MAX, RLIM_INFINITY_UL, resource,
> I suggest to split it into another tst_res() message, line above is nearly 200 characters.
Sorry, I shouldn't append debug code to patch.
--Hongzhi
>
> Regards,
> Jan
>
>> kind, val_u64,
>> resource, kind, val_ul);
>> return -1;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.8.1
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
>>
More information about the ltp
mailing list