[LTP] [PATCH v4] syscalls/prctl06: New test for prctl() with PR_{SET, GET}_NO_NEW_PRIVS
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
Tue Jul 16 11:09:08 CEST 2019
Hi!
Pushed with two changes, thanks.
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/prctl/prctl06.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/prctl/prctl06.c
index eafbedfef..0e1274a2a 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/prctl/prctl06.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/prctl/prctl06.c
@@ -81,8 +81,8 @@ static void setup(void)
SAFE_CP(TESTBIN, TEST_REL_BIN_DIR);
- SAFE_CHMOD(BIN_PATH, SUID_MODE);
SAFE_CHOWN(BIN_PATH, 0, 0);
+ SAFE_CHMOD(BIN_PATH, SUID_MODE);
TEST(prctl(PR_GET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 0, 0, 0, 0));
if (TST_RET == 0) {
This is actually important fix, you have to set the SUID bits last since
they are cleared if you change owner of the file.
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/prctl/prctl06.h b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/prctl/prctl06.h
index 72f9c4e5a..f5c66e809 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/prctl/prctl06.h
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/prctl/prctl06.h
@@ -25,12 +25,14 @@
#define BIN_PATH MNTPOINT"/"TESTBIN
#define SUID_MODE (S_ISUID|S_ISGID|S_IXUSR|S_IXGRP|S_IXOTH)
-static int flag = 1;
-
void check_proc_field(int val, char *name)
{
+ static int flag = 1;
int field = 0;
+ if (!flag)
+ return;
+
TEST(FILE_LINES_SCANF(PROC_STATUS, "NoNewPrivs:%d", &field));
if (TST_RET == 1) {
tst_res(TCONF,
@@ -57,8 +59,8 @@ void check_no_new_privs(int val, char *name)
tst_res(TFAIL,
"%s prctl(PR_GET_NO_NEW_PRIVS) expected %d got %ld",
name, val, TST_RET);
- if (flag)
- check_proc_field(val, name);
+
+ check_proc_field(val, name);
}
#endif
This is merely cosmetic and moves the flag to the function so that it's
not global.
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
More information about the ltp
mailing list