[LTP] [PATCH v2] syscalls/prctl08: New test for prctl() with PR_{SET, GET}_TIMERSLACK
Yang Xu
xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com
Sat Jul 27 10:27:11 CEST 2019
Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
-----
v1->v2:
1)remove useless struct member
2)compare time should be (sleep + timer_slack) if time is not enough large
---
include/lapi/prctl.h | 5 +
runtest/syscalls | 1 +
testcases/kernel/syscalls/prctl/.gitignore | 1 +
testcases/kernel/syscalls/prctl/Makefile | 1 +
testcases/kernel/syscalls/prctl/prctl08.c | 118 +++++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 126 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/syscalls/prctl/prctl08.c
diff --git a/include/lapi/prctl.h b/include/lapi/prctl.h
index 8ee492259..0b4e196c3 100644
--- a/include/lapi/prctl.h
+++ b/include/lapi/prctl.h
@@ -19,6 +19,11 @@
# define PR_SET_SECCOMP 22
#endif
+#ifndef PR_SET_TIMERSLACK
+# define PR_SET_TIMERSLACK 29
+# define PR_GET_TIMERSLACK 30
+#endif
+
#ifndef PR_SET_CHILD_SUBREAPER
# define PR_SET_CHILD_SUBREAPER 36
# define PR_GET_CHILD_SUBREAPER 37
diff --git a/runtest/syscalls b/runtest/syscalls
index 0114b002b..48836f422 100644
--- a/runtest/syscalls
+++ b/runtest/syscalls
@@ -872,6 +872,7 @@ prctl04 prctl04
prctl05 prctl05
prctl06 prctl06
prctl07 prctl07
+prctl08 prctl08
pread01 pread01
pread01_64 pread01_64
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/prctl/.gitignore b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/prctl/.gitignore
index 2178db366..fe36a8e0f 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/prctl/.gitignore
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/prctl/.gitignore
@@ -6,3 +6,4 @@
/prctl06
/prctl06_execve
/prctl07
+/prctl08
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/prctl/Makefile b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/prctl/Makefile
index cf19507c0..d3c41ff4e 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/prctl/Makefile
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/prctl/Makefile
@@ -21,5 +21,6 @@ top_srcdir ?= ../../../..
include $(top_srcdir)/include/mk/testcases.mk
prctl07: LDLIBS += $(CAP_LIBS)
+prctl08: LDLIBS+=-lrt
include $(top_srcdir)/include/mk/generic_leaf_target.mk
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/prctl/prctl08.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/prctl/prctl08.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..92b9bfe41
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/prctl/prctl08.c
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2019 FUJITSU LIMITED. All rights reserved.
+ * Author: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
+ *
+ * Test PR_GET_TIMERSLACK and PR_SET_TIMERSLACK of prctl(2).
+ * 1)Each thread has two associated timer slack values: a "default"
+ * value, and a "current" value. PR_SET_TIMERSLACK sets the "current"
+ * timer slack value for the calling thread.
+ * 2)When a new thread is created, the two timer slack values are made
+ * the same as the "current" value of the creating thread.
+ * 3)The maximum timer slack value is ULONG_MAX. On 32bit machines, it
+ * is a valid value(about 4s). On 64bit machines, it is about 500 years
+ * and no person will set this over 4s. prctl return value is int, so
+ * we test themaximum value is INT_MAX.
+ * 4)we also check /proc/[pid]/timerslack_ns if it is supported.
+ */
+
+#include <sys/prctl.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <linux/limits.h>
+#include "lapi/syscalls.h"
+#include "lapi/prctl.h"
+#include "tst_timer.h"
+#include "tst_test.h"
+
+#define PROC_NS_PATH "/proc/self/timerslack_ns"
+
+static struct tcase {
+ unsigned long setvalue;
+ unsigned long cmptime;
+} tcases[] = {
+ {1, 50000},
+ {70000, 120000},
+ {INT_MAX, 50000},
+};
+
+static int proc_flag = 1;
+
+static void check_proc_ns(char *message, unsigned long value)
+{
+ unsigned long proc_value;
+
+ SAFE_FILE_SCANF(PROC_NS_PATH, "%lu", &proc_value);
+ if (proc_value == value)
+ tst_res(TPASS, "%s %s got %lu expectedly",
+ message, PROC_NS_PATH, proc_value);
+ else
+ tst_res(TFAIL, "%s %s expected %lu got %lu",
+ message, PROC_NS_PATH, value, proc_value);
+}
+
+static void check_get_timerslack(char *message, unsigned long value)
+{
+ TEST(prctl(PR_GET_TIMERSLACK));
+ if ((unsigned long)TST_RET == value)
+ tst_res(TPASS, "%s prctl(PR_GET_TIMERSLACK) got %lu expectedly",
+ message, value);
+ else
+ tst_res(TFAIL, "%s prctl(PR_GET_TIMERSLACK) expected %lu got %lu",
+ message, value, TST_RET);
+
+ if (proc_flag)
+ check_proc_ns(message, value);
+}
+
+static void verify_prctl(unsigned int n)
+{
+ struct tcase *tc = &tcases[n];
+ int pid;
+
+ struct timespec timereq = { .tv_sec = 0, .tv_nsec = 50000 };
+ struct timespec timecmp = { .tv_sec = 0, .tv_nsec = tc->cmptime};
+
+ TEST(prctl(PR_SET_TIMERSLACK, tc->setvalue));
+ if (TST_RET == -1) {
+ tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "prctl(PR_SET_TIMERSLACK, %lu) failed",
+ tc->setvalue);
+ return;
+ }
+ tst_res(TPASS, "prctl(PR_SET_TIMERSLACK, %lu) success", tc->setvalue);
+
+ pid = SAFE_FORK();
+ if (pid == 0) {
+ check_get_timerslack("child process", tc->setvalue);
+ /* A value of 0 means using default */
+ prctl(PR_SET_TIMERSLACK, 0);
+ check_get_timerslack("After set 0, child process", tc->setvalue);
+
+ tst_timer_start(CLOCK_MONOTONIC);
+ TEST(nanosleep(&timereq, NULL));
+ tst_timer_stop();
+
+ if (tst_timespec_lt(tst_timer_elapsed(), timecmp))
+ tst_brk(TFAIL, "nanosleep() slept less than timecmp");
+
+ tst_res(TPASS, "nanosleep() slept more than timecmp, %llius",
+ tst_timer_elapsed_us());
+ exit(0);
+ }
+}
+
+static void setup(void)
+{
+ if (access(PROC_NS_PATH, F_OK) == -1) {
+ tst_res(TCONF, "proc doesn't support timerslack_ns interface");
+ proc_flag = 0;
+ }
+}
+
+static struct tst_test test = {
+ .setup = setup,
+ .test = verify_prctl,
+ .tcnt = ARRAY_SIZE(tcases),
+ .forks_child = 1,
+};
--
2.18.1
More information about the ltp
mailing list