[LTP] [PATCH DRAFT] syscalls/stime: convert to new lib, use direct syscall
Tue Mar 12 18:51:36 CET 2019
On 03/06/2019 10:02 PM, Xiao Yang wrote:
> Hi Cyril, Steve
> According to the source code of glibc, glibc implements stime() by
> instead of __NR_stime, and some arches(e.g. x86_64) don't define
> __NR_stime directly.
> Therefore these updated tests will be skipped on some arches that don't
> define __NR_stime.
> If glibc implements stime(), should we use it diectly? If not, should
> we use __NR_stime or __NR_settimeofday?
I think both should be tested. Once Cyril's test multiplex addition goes
into the test lib there probably needs to be an effort to revisit cases
More information about the ltp