[LTP] [PATCH DRAFT] syscalls/stime: convert to new lib, use direct syscall

[Steve Muckle]

Hi Xiao,

On 03/06/2019 10:02 PM, Xiao Yang wrote:
> Hi Cyril, Steve
> 
> According to the source code of glibc, glibc implements stime() by
> __NR_settimeofday
> instead of __NR_stime, and some arches(e.g. x86_64) don't define
> __NR_stime directly.
> Therefore these updated tests will be skipped on some arches that don't
> define __NR_stime.
> 
> If glibc implements stime(), should we use it diectly?  If not, should
> we use __NR_stime or __NR_settimeofday?

I think both should be tested. Once Cyril's test multiplex addition goes 
into the test lib there probably needs to be an effort to revisit cases 
like these.

cheers,
Steve