[LTP] [PATCH 3/3] tst_test.sh, test.sh: report pass if both TPASS and TCONF exist in shell test
Li Wang
liwang@redhat.com
Fri May 31 05:37:34 CEST 2019
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:11 PM Caspar Zhang <caspar@linux.alibaba.com>
wrote:
> We don't want the test reporting TCONF if at least one TPASS existed
> during testing. And this is also true in shell tests. So fix it.
>
PATCH 3/3 makes sense to me.
Reviewed-by: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Caspar Zhang <caspar@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> testcases/lib/test.sh | 9 +++++++++
> testcases/lib/tst_test.sh | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/lib/test.sh b/testcases/lib/test.sh
> index ade8fcdff..7cc3bb2fe 100644
> --- a/testcases/lib/test.sh
> +++ b/testcases/lib/test.sh
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>
> export LTP_RET_VAL=0
> export TST_COUNT=1
> +export TST_PASS_COUNT=0
> export TST_LIB_LOADED=1
> export TST_TMPDIR_RHOST=0
>
> @@ -60,6 +61,10 @@ tst_resm()
> case "$ret" in
> TPASS|TFAIL|TCONF) TST_COUNT=$((TST_COUNT+1));;
> esac
> +
> + if [ "$ret" = TPASS ]; then
> + TST_PASS_COUNT=$((TST_PASS_COUNT+1))
> + fi
> }
>
> tst_brkm()
> @@ -111,6 +116,10 @@ tst_exit()
> rm -f "$LTP_IPC_PATH"
> fi
>
> + # Mask out TCONF if no TFAIL/TBROK/TWARN but has TPASS
> + if [ $((LTP_RET_VAL & 7)) -eq 0 -a $TST_PASS_COUNT -gt 0 ]; then
> + LTP_RET_VAL=$((LTP_RET_VAL & ~32))
> + fi
> # Mask out TINFO
> exit $((LTP_RET_VAL & ~16))
> }
> diff --git a/testcases/lib/tst_test.sh b/testcases/lib/tst_test.sh
> index 512732315..bf725fdde 100644
> --- a/testcases/lib/tst_test.sh
> +++ b/testcases/lib/tst_test.sh
> @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ _tst_do_exit()
> ret=$((ret|4))
> fi
>
> - if [ $TST_CONF -gt 0 ]; then
> + if [ $TST_CONF -gt 0 -a $TST_PASS -eq 0 ]; then
> ret=$((ret|32))
> fi
>
> --
> 2.21.0
>
>
> --
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
>
--
Regards,
Li Wang
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/attachments/20190531/9ea6f2e3/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the ltp
mailing list