[LTP] [PATCH v1] cgroup_fj_stress: Avoid killall
Clemens Famulla-Conrad
cfamullaconrad@suse.de
Tue Nov 5 14:49:04 CET 2019
Hi Petr,
On Tue, 2019-11-05 at 14:20 +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
<snip>
> I wonder if we also want to kill cgroup_fj_proc this way (see
> cgroup_fj_common.sh).
I'm not sure if I understand you. We do kill cgroup_fj_proc this way.
The `killall -9 cgroup_fj_proc` call in cgrouip_fj_common.sh looks for
me like a cleaner and there is no `wait` or similar afterwards, so I
would guess we are not facing the problem here. And I would keep
killall here.
As far as I can see, all other `cgroup_fj_proc&` calls already kill
them separately.
> I guess you're not planning to create minimal reproducer to prove the
> problem of
> left processes after killall, are you?
Sure nice idea, I can give it a try. But not within this patchset.
Thanks
Clemens
More information about the ltp
mailing list